Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Red is Louboutin
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
Luxury shoe designer Christian Louboutin received a favourable ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) recognising its claim to the colour red (pantone 18-1663TP) as a trade mark.
Louboutin successfully sued Dutch shoe retailer van Haren for infringing its signature colour red trade mark applied to high heel shoes in 2013. Van Haren, however, retaliated and applied to invalidate Louboutin’s colour red trade mark on the grounds that it comprised exclusively of a shape (being the shape of the sole of a high heeled shoe) and as a result was not valid as an EU trade mark.
The court ruled that the trade mark granted protects the colour as applied to a specific part of the shoe, rather than a shape which demonstrates the contour of the shoe to which the colour red is applied.
This ruling means that Louboutin now has exclusivity in relation to red soles for shoes – very powerful protection indeed.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Mind the Conduct: A Guide to COFI – Part 4: Principles and Conduct Requirements
by Hilah Laskov, Director Introduction In this article series, we take a deep dive into the South African Conduct of [...]
The Concept of “Need” in South Africa’s Healthcare Framework: From Certificates of Need to National Health Insurance Accreditation
by Neil Kirby, Director and Head of Healthcare & Life Sciences and Vhutshilo Muambadzi, Candidate Attorney On 18 May 2026, the [...]
The Chief Restructuring Officer in South Africa in 2026: A real option for the turnaround of distressed entities
by Eric Levenstein, Head of Insolvency and Business Rescue As South African companies continue to suffer from an ailing economy, [...]
Business rescue recapitalisations upheld: the legal and commercial significance of White Rivers Exploration v Polsun
by Jonathan Stockwell, Director, Amy Mackechnie, Senior Associate and Clio Patricios, Candidate Attorney The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, has delivered [...]
Leave to Appeal Refused, but Questions Remain: The Matric Results Privacy Dispute and the Meaning of Personal Information under POPIA
by: Armand Swart, Director and Isabella Keeves, Candidate Attorney On 3 June 2026, the Gauteng High Court refused the Information [...]
Mind the Conduct: A Guide to COFI – Part 3: Consumer Protection and Transparency
by Hilah Laskov, Director Introduction In this article series, we take a deep dive into the South African Conduct of [...]

