Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Roger federer – the ownership of the trade mark comprising of his initials
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
In August 2018, tennis champion Roger Federer terminated the sponsorship agreement with Nike having entered a US$300 million contract with Japanese casual wear, designer, manufacturer and clothing retailer Uniqlo.
On termination a dispute arose concerning Nike’s ownership of the trade mark , which Nike has registered as a trade mark in twenty five countries. As the mark comprises Roger Federer’s initials, Federer has requested that the trade mark be transferred to himself.
While the use of one’s personal name is recognised as a defence this is only so if consistent with ‘fair practice’ and in this instance the question concerns the terms of the commercial contract entered between Federer and Nike and where the goodwill in the trade marks and intellectual property resides now that it has terminated. The outcome of the dispute is not yet known but it does serve as a salient reminder to take the necessary steps to ensure that an owner files trade marks extensively and protects all intellectual property at the outset in order to ensure that the mark can form the basis of contracts commercialising such intellectual property.
Latest News
Exporters to China remain positive as new balance comes out tops in trade mark tussle
American multinational New Balance has recently been awarded the highest amount in damages to a foreign entity in trade mark [...]
Cleaning house
In the recent judgment of Jordaan and Others v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality and Others[1] the Constitutional Court provided [...]
The Protected Disclosures Amendment Act, No 5 of 2017
On 31 July 2017 the President of the Republic of South Africa assented to the Protected Disclosures Amendment Act 5 [...]
The pitfalls of resignation
ISSUE If an employee resigns, then decides to retract her resignation but her employer refuses to allow her to [...]
Enforceability of medical testing as a clause in an employment contract
Pharmaco Distribution (Pty) Ltd v Weideman (JA104/2015) [2017] ZALCJHB 258 (4 July 2017) ISSUE Whether an employer can [...]
Are trade mark clearance searches necessary?
INTRODUCTION We are asked by clients on regular occasions whether there is a need to conduct searches of the [...]
