Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Roger federer – the ownership of the trade mark comprising of his initials
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
In August 2018, tennis champion Roger Federer terminated the sponsorship agreement with Nike having entered a US$300 million contract with Japanese casual wear, designer, manufacturer and clothing retailer Uniqlo.
On termination a dispute arose concerning Nike’s ownership of the trade mark , which Nike has registered as a trade mark in twenty five countries. As the mark comprises Roger Federer’s initials, Federer has requested that the trade mark be transferred to himself.
While the use of one’s personal name is recognised as a defence this is only so if consistent with ‘fair practice’ and in this instance the question concerns the terms of the commercial contract entered between Federer and Nike and where the goodwill in the trade marks and intellectual property resides now that it has terminated. The outcome of the dispute is not yet known but it does serve as a salient reminder to take the necessary steps to ensure that an owner files trade marks extensively and protects all intellectual property at the outset in order to ensure that the mark can form the basis of contracts commercialising such intellectual property.
Latest News
Employment in South Africa – a relationship built on trust
The employment relationship between an employer and its employees is heavily regulated in South African law and there are [...]
Testing the reliability of breathalyser tests
and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorney Whilst employers regularly rely on the convenience and accessibility of a breathalyser test to determine [...]
Salary made up of commission: What rules apply?
Although South African labour law has a lot to say about minimum terms and conditions of employment, and pieces [...]
Sustainable housing: Navigating the legal landscape for a green and resilient future
One of the first principles recognised in the Paris Agreement[1] is the importance of "sustainable lifestyles and sustainable patterns [...]
Powers of the Information Regulator and how the Department of Justice could have avoided a R5 million fine
There has been great anxiety amongst organisations since the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) came [...]
The extent of an arbitrator’s jurisdiction
In the recent decision of Dis-Chem Pharmacies Limited v Dainfern Square (Pty) Ltd & Others[1] the Supreme Court of [...]