Legal updates and opinions
News / News
South Africa: Merger Notification Thresholds and Filing Fees Increase from 1 May 2026
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory and Raisah O Mahomed, Associate
South Africa’s Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition has, in a notice, published revised merger notification thresholds and filing fees under the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (“Competition Act“), effective 1 May 2026. The updated thresholds raise the turnover and asset values that determine whether a transaction is classified as a small, intermediate, or large merger, meaning that some deals which previously required mandatory notification may now fall below the filing threshold. At the same time, the filing fees payable on intermediate and large merger notifications have been increased. These changes will be relevant to any business contemplating M&A activity with a South African dimension from 1 May 2026 onwards.
What has changed?
Merger notification thresholds
The Competition Act requires parties to notify the Competition Commission (“Commission“) of mergers that meet prescribed turnover and asset thresholds. These thresholds have been adjusted upwards as set out in the table below; the underlying calculation methodology, which tests the combined position of the acquiring and transferred firms as well as the position of the transferred firm alone, measured “in, into or from” the Republic, remains unchanged.
| Threshold element | Previous value | New value (from 1 May 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Lower threshold – combined (turnover or asset value, or turnover and asset value combined, of acquiring and transferred firms) | R600 million | R1 billion |
| Lower threshold – transferred firm (turnover or asset value of the transferred firm) | R100 million | R200 million |
| Higher threshold – combined (turnover or asset value, or turnover and asset value combined, of acquiring and transferred firms) | R6.6 billion | R9.5 billion |
| Higher threshold – transferred firm (turnover or asset value of the transferred firm) | R190 million | R280 million |
In broad terms, the classification works as follows:
- a transaction that falls below either limb of the lower threshold is a small merger and is not subject to mandatory notification;
- a transaction that meets both limbs of the lower threshold but falls below either limb of the higher threshold is an intermediate merger, notifiable to the Commission; and
- a transaction that meets both limbs of the higher threshold is a large merger, notifiable to both the Commission and the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal“).
Filing fees
The fees payable on filing a merger notification have also been increased, as follows:
| Merger category | Previous fee | New fee (from 1 May 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediate merger | R165,000 | R220,000 |
| Large merger | R550,000 | R735,000 |
Effective date
Despite the notice being published on 8 May 2026, both the revised thresholds and the new filing fees take effect retrospectively from 1 May 2026. The published notices do not include any transitional provisions, so the new regime will apply to notifications lodged on or after that date.
Practical implications for clients
Notification obligations
The increase in the lower thresholds is substantive, the combined threshold has risen from R600 million to R1 billion, and the transferred firm threshold has doubled from R100 million to R200 million. Transactions that would previously have been classified as notifiable intermediate mergers may now fall below the lower threshold and qualify as small mergers exempt from mandatory notification. Conversely, the uplift in the higher thresholds from R6.6 billion to R9.5 billion (combined) and from R190 million to R280 million (transferred firm) means that some transactions previously classified as large mergers may now fall into the intermediate category, with corresponding procedural and timing benefits.
Deal structuring and timetabling
For transactions currently in the pipeline, parties should reassess their merger control analysis against the new thresholds. Where the revised thresholds affect a deal’s classification, there may be implications for whether the transaction requires notification to the Commission, alternatively notification to the Commission and approval by the Tribunal, the anticipated review timeline, and the overall transaction timetable.
But more important at this moment in time, since the new thresholds came into operation on 1 May 2026, filing fees could very well be refundable or dealteams should expect an amended invoice!
Transaction budgets
The increased filing fees, R220,000 for an intermediate merger and R735,000 for a large merger, should be factored into transaction cost estimates for deals expected to be notified from 1 May 2026 onwards.
Retained call-in power
It is important to remember that even where a transaction falls below the mandatory notification thresholds and is classified as a small merger, the Commission retains the power to require notification within six months of implementation. Parties to transactions that narrowly fall below the new thresholds should continue to assess whether a voluntary notification may be prudent.
Contact us
If you have any questions about how these changes may affect a planned or ongoing transaction, or if you would like assistance with a merger notification assessment, please contact a member of our competition team. We would be happy to assist.
Latest News
Defamation in Labour Law – Manqele V Baloyi Masango Inc Attorneys and Others (896/2023) [2025] Zampmbhc 75 (12 August 2025)
by Bankey Sono, Director and Neo Sewela, Senior Associate It is not unusual for employers to appoint a law firm [...]
Voluntary liquidations: A cost effective and efficient method of conducting a corporate clean-up, and for ending the existence of dormant companies
by Brendan Olivier Quite understandably, the word 'liquidation' can send shivers down the spine, and cause a company director to [...]
Substance dependence in the workplace- misconduct or incapacity?
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director, Nasheetah Smith - Senior Associate & Isabella Keeves - Candidate Attorney One of the challenges [...]
Cutting the baby in half – when equality meets reality: Paid maternity leave after Van Wyk v Minister of Employment and Labour
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director and Kerry Fredericks, Director The Constitutional Court's recent judgment in Van Wyk and Others v Minister [...]
SME cashflow threats: when liquidation strikes a supplier or customer
by Brendan Olivier An SME that permits its customers and suppliers to trade with it on credit terms, does so [...]
Global developments in gambling, betting and e-sports regulation: Lessons for South Africa
by Tebogo Sibidla, Director Like many other sectors of the economy that rely on technology, online gambling, gaming and betting [...]
