Legal updates and opinions
News / News
South Africa: reliance on trade marks in company name objections
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
A further reason to register trade marks is that they can be relied upon in company name objections.
The Companies Act of 2008 provides for the procedure in which a party can object to the registration of a company name which offends against the provisions of section 11 and the company can be directed to amend its name.
A company name objection can be filed inter alia, if the name –
- is the same as the name of another company;
- is the same as a registered trade mark belonging to a person other than the company, or a mark in respect of which an application has been filed for registration as a trade mark or a well-known trade mark; or
- confusingly similar to a name, trade mark, mark, word or expression.
The objection takes the form of an affidavit filed by the objector in which the basis of the objection is set out in some detail.
As an objector can rely upon trade mark applications and registrations in these objections, it is a further reason to secure trade mark protection.
Werksmans was successful in a recent company name objection on behalf of Capitec Bank against the registration of CAPITEC LIFE by a third party. The objection was based on the name of the company but reliance was also heavily placed on the registered trade marks in Capitec’s name.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
EMPLOYEES MAY APPROACH THE LABOUR COURT DIRECTLY TO ENFORCE THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE BASIC CONDITIONS OF THE EMPLOYMENT ACT
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether the Labour Court [...]
THE RESTRICTIONS ON A COMMISSIONER TO DEAL WITH A DISPUTE NOT FORMALLY BEFORE HIM
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether the commissioner acted [...]
SECTION 198A(3)(B) DEEMING PROVISION: LIABILITY FOR THE CLIENT EMPLOYER REGARDLESS OF THE ROLE THAT THE EMPLOYER STILL RETAINS
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE In the case of [...]
RESIGNATION WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT – A TALE OF CONFUSION
By Sandile Tom, Director and Dale Adams, Candidate Attorney It is trite law that certain prescribed periods of notice become [...]
DISMISSED FOR NOT ACCEPTING AN EMPLOYER’S DEMAND – WHEN IS THIS AUTOMATICALLY UNFAIR?
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 ("LRA"), which generally protects employees in South Africa against [...]
CONDUCT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS BILL
By Tracy-Lee Janse van Rensburg, Director and Reuben Lebelo, Candidate Attorney Following on the Financial Sector Regulation Act, 2017 ("FSR Act"), [...]
