Legal updates and opinions
News / News
South Africa: reliance on trade marks in company name objections
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
A further reason to register trade marks is that they can be relied upon in company name objections.
The Companies Act of 2008 provides for the procedure in which a party can object to the registration of a company name which offends against the provisions of section 11 and the company can be directed to amend its name.
A company name objection can be filed inter alia, if the name –
- is the same as the name of another company;
- is the same as a registered trade mark belonging to a person other than the company, or a mark in respect of which an application has been filed for registration as a trade mark or a well-known trade mark; or
- confusingly similar to a name, trade mark, mark, word or expression.
The objection takes the form of an affidavit filed by the objector in which the basis of the objection is set out in some detail.
As an objector can rely upon trade mark applications and registrations in these objections, it is a further reason to secure trade mark protection.
Werksmans was successful in a recent company name objection on behalf of Capitec Bank against the registration of CAPITEC LIFE by a third party. The objection was based on the name of the company but reliance was also heavily placed on the registered trade marks in Capitec’s name.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Explanatory Note
"No right, including the right to strike, is absolute." (AMCU and Others vs Anglo Gold Ashanti and Others) The right [...]
National minimum wage increases for 2022
Adjusted national minimum wage Following a mandatory annual review process, the Minister of Employment and Labour announced increases to the [...]
Earnings threshold increase for 2022
Annual earnings threshold increase for 2022 The Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 ("BCEA") empowers the Minister of [...]
Is a report prepared in terms of S 165(4) of the Companies Act privileged?
by Jones Antunes Director, Danielle Hertz, Associate, and Marisha Krishna, Candidate Attorney This aforesaid is an issue that recently enjoyed [...]
Can’t make head or tail of POPIA? Lessons from Sheburi V Rail Safety Regulator
The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 ("POPIA") came [...]
There’s a hazardous biological agent in your workplace
The SARS CoV2 virus ("virus") that causes COVID-19 has been classified as a hazardous biological agent ("HBA"). The virus was [...]
