Legal updates and opinions
News / News
South Africa: trade marks as valuable assets to raise funding
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
The registration of trade marks has numerous advantages one of which is that as registered trade marks are assets they can be used as collateral to raise funding. The Trade Marks Act makes specific provision for the hypothecation of the marks which must however be registered before they could be hypothecated in this way.
This is a further reason to keep in mind when considering whether to file trade mark applications.
In light of the fact that trade mark applications take between 2 – 3 years to proceed to registration in South Africa, it is a good idea to file trade mark applications as soon as possible in order to ensure that these rights can be relied upon if this may be necessary for purposes of raising funding during different phases of a company’s history.
It must also be kept in mind that trade marks can be registered in one or more of 45 classes. If a mark is used or going to be used for different products and services it is important to file trade marks in the relevant classes. Each registration in the different classes is a separate and distinct trade mark registration which could be taken into account by the funders when raising the funding.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
E-waste versus Sustainability: A battle between people, big tech and responsible recycling
A study conducted by the United Nations University in 2019 estimated that approximately 53.6 million metric tonnes of electrical and [...]
The danger of cutting and pasting provisions in your settlement agreements!
On 21 February 2021, the Labour Appeal Court in Wheelwright v CP de Leeuw Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd (2023) 44 [...]
Enhancing Innovation, Technologically
Continuing Werksmans' multi-disciplinary approach in providing our clients with innovative approaches that go beyond the law into wider, business [...]
The proper interpretation of conflicting provisions in the Income Tax Act
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent tax court judgment added valuable jurisprudence to the often-litigated issue of the interpretation [...]
What is the relevance of s 52 of the MPRDA on retrenchments in terms of section 189 and 189A in the mining industry?
In National Union of Mineworkers v Anglo American Platinum Ltd & others (Amplats), on 15 January 2013, Amplats had [...]
Mining terminology: the difference between “accepted”, “granted” “executed” and “registered”
Four of the most common words that one hears in conjunction with mining rights, prospecting rights are "accepted", "granted", [...]