Legal updates and opinions
News / News
South African copyright bill vs European Union copyright directive – poles apart
Much has been written of late about the South African Copyright Bill which has attracted a significant amount of criticism from various quarters as being opposed to the interests of creators of copyrighted works and also in respect of the poor technical drafting thereof.
The reason for having intellectual property legislation, including in respect of copyright, is to ensure that creators are properly protected in order to drive innovation and creativity. In the event that there is not sufficient protection for creators there would be no incentive to create.
Copyright legislation should provide a balance between creating monopolies for the benefit of such creators and the access to such works by the public in certain circumstances. Without strong copyright protection, creation of copyright works will be discouraged.
As we move into the world of artificial intelligence and increasing reliance on digital material which lends itself to the pervasiveness of user-uploads, the ability for creators to protect their rights becomes even more difficult than before.
A coalition of content creators from the publishing, music, film, animation, visual arts and other industries have joined together to oppose the Bill and have written an open letter to the President who is to sign the Bill into law as it has passed through the relevant sections of parliament. It is only President Ramaphosa that can stop the Bill from becoming law.
It is however interesting that at the same time as this issue is raging in South Africa, the European Union has passed the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market which can be regarded as creator and author-friendly.
The EU Copyright Directive will bring the outdated copyright rules up to date by dealing with the posting of online content. The larger technology companies have opposed the legislation, especially Article 13, according to which any party providing content must obtain the consent from the owner or have attempted to obtain such consent. This means that platforms that host user-generated content, such as Youtube, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, are now responsible for the material that is uploaded and which they host. For this to be done, such platforms will have to create effective content recognition technologies or filters which have the ability of checking that the content uploaded by users does not infringe rights of a third party.
This provision of the EU directive in particular has been criticized by various parties as sounding the death knell to the independence of the internet and will discourage creativity.
What is interesting in these processes is that despite them taking place at more or less the same time, the focus thereof in the different jurisdictions is decidedly different.
We all await to see what Mr Ramaphosa will do and whether he will heed the concerns of the coalition or whether he will sign the Bill into law.
Latest News
South Africa: reliance on trade marks in company name objections
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors A further reason to register trade marks is that they can be relied [...]
China: motivation for e-commerce to act against counterfeiting
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors On 31 August 2018, China introduced legislation making online operations accountable. Online service [...]
Dismissing an employee for refusing to obey instructions
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Can you dismiss an employee who refuses to obey [...]
Johannesburg CBD fire – health and safety at work
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The recent fire which broke out in a government building in central Johannesburg lead to the [...]
Labour Webinar
Our Labour experts discuss the implications of the proposed amendments to the Labour Relations Act (LRA) relating to industrial action.
Limiting employment claims: protection where it is needed
South African labour laws are renowned as being progressive and protective of employees' rights, and labour dispute resolution procedures are [...]
