Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Summary of Recently Proposed Legislative Amendments: National Minimum Wage Act and Employment Equity Act
by Andre van Heerden, Director and Mikayla Ehrenreich, Candidate Attorney
Introduction
On 26 February 2026, the Minister of Employment and Labour (“Minister“) published, by way of the Government Gazette, a copy of the Labour Law Amendment Bill, 2025 and its Memorandum of Objects, along with the Labour Relations Amendment Bill, 2025 and its Memorandum of Objects.
The Labour Law Amendment Bill contains proposed amendments to the Basic Conditions of Employment Act[1] (“BCEA“), the Unemployment Insurance Act[2] (“UI Act“), the National Minimum Wage Act[3] (“NMWA“), and the Employment Equity Act[4] (“EEA“). The Labour Relations Amendment Bill contains proposed amendments to the Labour Relations Act[5] (“LRA“).
Whilst both the Labour Law Amendment Bill and the Labour Relations Bill propose several amendments to the aforesaid legislation, we highlight in this update some of those proposed amendments to the NMWA and the EEA which are likely to be of particular interest to employers.
A full copy of the Labour Law Amendment Bill, Labour Relations Amendment Bill alongside their Memorandum of Objects can be accessed, and read it full, at the Department of Employment and Labour’s website at https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Bills/Labour%20Relations%20Act,%202025_Labour%20Law%20Amendment%20Bill,%202025.pdf .
NMWA
Deferred Payments and minimum wage
The overall purpose of the NMWA is to provide for the minimum take-home pay which employees are entitled, and subsequently prevent the exploitation of vulnerable / low income workers. In response to the judgement Quantum Foods (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner H Jacobs N.O. (‘Quantum Foods’)[6], the Minister proposes that deferred payments be excluded from the determination of minimum wage.
Section 5(1) of the NMWA prescribes that the calculation of minimum wage is the amount payable for ordinary hours of work excluding, among others, gratuities including bonuses, tips, and gifts. In the matter of Quantum Foods, the question was whether an annual bonus and an employer’s provident fund contribution constituted a gratuity or a contractual obligation – a determination which would impact its inclusion, or exclusion, in the calculation of minimum wage. The Labour Appeal Court concluded that, on a proper interpretation of section 5(1) of the NMWA, a contractually agreed upon annual bonus doesn’t constitute a ‘gratuity’ in terms of section 5(1)(c), nor does a provident fund contribution fall to be excluded as a gratuitous payment.[7]
The proposed amendment seeks to change the position set out in the Quantum Foods decision by providing that deferred payments are excluded from the calculation of an employee’s minimum take-home pay.
EEA
The Labour Law Amendment Bill seeks to expand the ambit of section 10(6) (aA) of the EEA by entitling an employee to refer any claim concerning unfair discrimination on the grounds of harassment to the CCMA for arbitration where the dispute was not resolved through conciliation.
The previous entitlement under section 10(6)(aA) was limited to instances of sexual harassment, as opposed to a general ground for harassment.
Conclusion
The Labour Law Amendment Bill proposed to introduce several changes to various pieces of employment legislation such as the NMWA and the EEA. Several of these changes are likely, if implemented, to have an impact upon employers. Employer’s should, then, consider such proposed amendments in detail and whether they intend raising any objection(s) to same. Employers are reminded that any such objections must be raised by no later than 28 March 2026, in the stipulated manner.
Please contact Werksmans’ Employment practice area for any further information required.
[1] Act 75 of 1997.
[2] Act 63 of 2001.
[3] Act 9 of 2018.
[4] Act 55 of 1998.
[5] Act 6 of 1995.
[6] Quantum Foods (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner H Jacobs N.O. and Others (JA85/2022) [2023] ZALAC 27; [2024] 1 BLLR 32 (LAC); (2024) 45 ILJ 71 (LAC) (18 October 2023).
[7] Paragraphs 28 and 31 of Quantum Foods.
Latest News
What’s in a name – Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham
by Donvay Wegierski, Director What's in a name - Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham Brooklyn Beckham, son to British born [...]
Not Every Employee Is a Whistleblower (And Not Every Disciplinary Hearing Is Up for Debate)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Modika v Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa and another [...]
Deadlines Are Not Suggestions (And Finality Still Matters)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in NUMSA obo Members v Macsteel Service Centres South Africa [...]
Redundancy and the Duty to Consult: Lessons from Tsogo Sun Casinos v SACCAWU
by Jacques van Wyk - Director and Mike Searle - Candidate Attorney Retrenchment is often described as a ‘no-fault’ dismissal, [...]
Your Workforce Is Not Your Property
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Man Mining Technical Services (Pty) Ltd v Eagle Creek Investments [...]
The Fired and the Furious — and Still Restrained
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in Backsports (Pty) Ltd v Motlhanke and another is a [...]
