Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Take note and prepare to comment – Proposed Amendments to the COMESA Competition Regulations
and Chiara Ferri, Candidate Attorney
On 24 January 2024, the COMESA Competition Commission (“CCC”) published its Draft COMESA Competition and Consumer Protection Regulations (“Draft Regulations”). COMESA competition law is aiming to keep pace with current market developments with various regulations being amended and replaced. Written comments on the Draft Regulations by stakeholders are due by 14 February 2024. It is therefore crucial to consider some of the most noteworthy proposed amendments and what effect these changes may have for organisations in the current competition arena.
Determination of Dominance
The Draft Regulations seek to amend the CCC’s current determination of dominance. For example, the Draft Regulations specifically provide that if an undertaking holds a market share of at least 30% in the relevant market, it will be presumed to be dominant. In addition, it is stipulated that in determining whether an undertaking is dominant, consideration must be given to a host of factors, the most notable of which are –
- relevant market defined in terms of the product and the geographic context;
- barriers to entry, expansion and exit;
- history of competition and rivalry between competitors in the sector of activity;
- level of actual or potential competition in terms of number and size of competitors; and
- production capacity and product demand.
Draft Regulations Binding Member States
The Draft Regulations stipulate that Member States are precluded from relying on their own national laws where competition related conduct is covered under the CCC Regulations. The Draft Regulations seek to reinforce the notion that COMESA must be a one-stop-shop and therefore curtails the duplication of enforcement between national competition authorities and COMESA.
Transaction Value Threshold
Another proposed introduction in the Draft Regulations is that mergers in the digital market industry, which exceed a specified transaction value, must be notified to the CCC. The Draft Regulations neglect to define what a digital market industry is and it therefore remains unclear as to whether there are different thresholds for various markets.
Public Interest Grounds
The introduction of specific public interest grounds also form part of the Draft Regulations. If these are implemented, merging parties ought to be cognizant that the CCC will pay equal attention to public interest as it will to competition considerations.
Abuse of Dominance
On a final note, the Draft Regulations maintain the Current Regulations’ approach which treats abuse of dominance as an outright prohibition. This rigid stance runs the risk of ignoring nuanced market dynamics. This could hinder legitimate conduct which may enhance efficiency and benefit consumers. In the comings days, practitioner workshops will be held to discuss and comment on the CCC’s Draft Regulations. For access to the Draft Regulations, please click here.
Latest News
Asset for share transactions – beware of selling your shares within 18 months especially in the context of a share buy-back
To prevent tax considerations from discouraging the incorporation of a business, a specific form of ‘rollover relief’ is available when an asset [...]
A new era dawns – criminalisation of cartel conduct
On 22 April 2016, a Presidential Proclamation (“Proclamation”) appeared in the Government Gazette which confirmed that the provisions contained in [...]
The employer’s responsibility during the transfer of an employee
Senne and others v Fleet Africa [2016] ZALCJHB 48 ISSUE One of the automatic consequences of a transfer in [...]
Contracts of temporary employment services employees
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC) ISSUE [...]
SCA judgments: Capstone & Kluh
In our November 2014 edition of Legalwerks, we discussed the decisions of the Full Bench of the High Court of [...]
Property buyers may be liable for historical debt
In a recent judgement handed down by the Supreme Court of Appeal, the court ruled that a hypothec created by [...]
