Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Tanzania introduces Trade Mark Rights Recordation for all imports
by Donvay Wegierski, Director and Andreya John, Candidate Attorney
As of 1 December 2025, in an initiative administered by the Fair Competition Commission (“FCC”), Tanzania will implement Trade Marks Rights Recordation as a precondition for marks relating to goods which are imported into mainland Tanzania. This is in accordance with Section 11A of the Merchandise Marks Act, 1963 (as amended) and the Merchandise Marks (Recordation) Regulations, 2025.
Trade marks are territory specific however if the mark is not yet registered in Tanzania but elsewhere, those registrations are also valid for Recordation in support of the broader regulatory framework.
Tanzania joins other African countries in recognising that customs and intellectual property recordations with the relevant authorities proactively address anti-counterfeiting, protecting and defending intellectual property rights (“IPR”). IPR recordations assist authorities in recognising, seizing and detaining counterfeit or unauthorised goods particularly at borders and ports.
Section 11A of the Merchandise Marks Act, 1963 (as amended) provides that trade marks on imported goods into Tanzania shall be recorded with the Chief Inspector of the FCC. Failure to comply may result in customs authorities seizing or denying clearance of unrecorded imports, assuming them to be unauthorised or counterfeit, disrupting supply chains and business operations.
As of 1 December 2025, only agents formally appointed through a valid Power of Attorney will be authorised to act on behalf of trade mark owners in all matters relating to Trade Mark Rights Recordation before the FCC. The Public Notice No. 352F published on 30 June 2025 can be accessed here.
To apply for Recordation, Applicants must submit the following:
- Full particulars of the applicant;
- Nationality or jurisdiction of incorporation of the trade mark owner;
- Place of manufacture of the goods;
- A sample or clear digital photographs of the goods;
- Details of licensees and the nature of their authorisation;
- Information on parent, subsidiary, or affiliated companies;
- Certified copies of relevant trade mark registration certificates;
- Proof of payment of the application fee.
The Chief Inspector is required to decide on the application within twenty-one days of receipt and communicate the decision within five days thereafter. Once approved, recordations are valid for one year and renewable annually. Any changes in ownership or registrant details must be promptly reported, and the recordation will be cancelled if the associated trade mark registration is revoked or cancelled.
A recordation register will be maintained by the Chief Inspector, and authorised individuals may request access or copies upon payment of the prescribed fee.
Please contact the Werksmans Intellectual Property Team for further assistance.
Latest News
Code Red to Code Regulated: South Africa’s Data, AI and Cybersecurity Shift in 2025, and What’s to Come in 2026?
by Armand Swart, Director, Hlonelwa Lutuli, Associate and Hanán Jeppie, Candidate Attorney South Africa's data protection, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence [...]
The Gauteng school placements crisis (2026) – Why children are still waiting and what the law says
By Naledi Motsiri - Director and Nothando Nyoni - Associate As the 2026 school year begins, many parents in Gauteng [...]
The Introduction of a Dedicated Insolvency Court in Pretoria
by Eric Levenstein - Director and Head of Insolvency & Business Rescue and Amy Mackechnie - Senior Associate Following the [...]
Regulatory Snapshot: Financial Services and AML
by Hilah Laskov, Director In this article, we lay out the main regulatory and legal developments in 2025 that [...]
The Need to Plead Properly – Patel vs South African Securitisation Programme (RF) LTD & Others (790/2024) [2025] SASCA 186
by Jennifer Smit, Director On 8 December 2025, the SCA handed down a decision in the above matter which [...]
The union doth protest too much: NUMSA v BMW and the limits of court intervention in disciplinary proceedings
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The Labour Court’s judgment in NUMSA on behalf of Members v BMW (SA) (Pty) Ltd [...]
