Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme: tax implications
by Doelie, Lessing, Director and Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate
On 16 April 2020 the Minister of Employment and Labour issued amendments to the directives governing the Covid-19 Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS“). These must still be published in the Government Gazette. The directives provide, among others, that in order to speed up payment of Covid-19 benefits to employees, employers are urged to pay employees benefits in advance and then reimburse or set off such amounts against funds received from the Unemployment Insurance Fund (“UIF“).
While there are no express tax regulations/directives or amendments issued on whether employers should be treated as ‘agents’ when collecting payment from the UIF there is a strong basis to argue that this is the case and that the payment of these amounts to the employees should not result in a PAYE liability on the TERS benefits. PAYE must, therefore, not be deducted from the TERS benefits. It is also arguable that employees should be exempt from paying tax on the benefits received, as the tax legislation provides for a general exemption from tax of benefits or allowances payable in terms of the Unemployment Insurance Act – provided that the TERS benefits are legally payable in terms of that Act (which appears to be the intention). It is advisable, when affecting electronic payments to the employees’ bank accounts, that the amounts clearly be recorded as ‘UIF TERS benefits.’ This clearly distinguish the payments from any remuneration payments ordinarily received.
Should you require any formal advice regarding the above please do not hesitate to contact us.
Latest News
The Balancing Act: The Sharing of Company Information by Exiting Shareholders with Potential Third-Party Purchasers
and Emma Reid, Candidate Attorney INTRODUCTION The default position regarding who can access a company's records and information ("company information") [...]
Court Orders Gauteng Department of Health to Provide Cancer Treatment to Patients Awaiting Care
and Slade van Rooyen - Candidate Attorney and Farah Yassin - Candidate Attorney On 27 March 2025, the Gauteng Local [...]
Allegations of Ethnic Discrimination Require Evidence: the Sagan Principle
and Isabella Keeves - Candidate Attorney In 1979 science communicator and physicist Carl Sagan wrote in his book Broca's Brain [...]
The Clock Is Ticking: Labour Disputes and the Perils of Miscalculating Timeframes
The recent Labour Court decision in Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality v SAMWU obo Bukula and Others (PR174/2023) provides a sobering [...]
Automatic Termination Clauses Do Not Trump the LRA: The Biyana Case
and Isabella Keeves – Candidate Attorney The CCMA’s recent decision in Biyana v National Consumer Commission (2025) 34 CCMA 7.17.2 [...]
FICA: Proposed changes to Public Compliance Communication 50 and Directive 3 previously issued by the Financial Intelligence Centre
by Sandiso Dhlomo, Associate and Nhlonipho Mthembu, Candidate Attorney reviewed by Tracy Lee Janse van Rensburg On 14 March 2025, [...]