Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) extension: appeal process and update
Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”)
On 27 March 2021 the Unemployment Insurance Fund (”UIF“) issued a letter outlining the appeal process for the lockdown period 16 October 2020 until 15 March 2021.
On 1 March 2021 the UIF opened its online portal for sector based claims. The online portal performed a “real check on the business activity and the main division sector selected by the user”. If the sector selected did not match with the SARS database, one of the following error messages would be generated preventing a claim being lodged.
- The Entity is registered with SARS without Industry/Sector classification;
- The Entity is registered with SARS under “‘|sars class| ‘”class, which is not a qualified sector category for TERS payment; or
- The Entity is not registered with SARS under a qualified sector category for TERS payment (the entity is not registered)
This decision can either be accepted or rejected. Appeals can be lodged via the UIF Call Centre from 6 April 2021. The employer will be subjected to an authentication process and a link will then be sent to the employer to upload an appeal form as well as supporting documentation. A decision will then be made to accept the appeal or decline it.
If the appeal has been approved, the employer may re-lodge their TERS claim within 72 hours. Employers will select their business activity as previously done and select “OTHER (APPROVED APPEALS)” for the main division sector.
Further details regarding the appeal process, as well as further information on changes to the TERS bank verification system, are contained in the letter, which can be accessed at https://www.nsbc.africa/storage/covid_files/1617092816.pdf .
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Lukrisha Ramadu, Candidate Attorney
Latest News
HAUNTED BY THE PAST … UNTIL WHEN SHOULD HISTORIC CARTEL CONDUCT SPOOK YOU?
By Rudolph Raath, Director and Megan Livingstone COMPETITION COMMISSION V PICKFORDS REMOVAL (167/CAC/Jul18) How long does a firm remain at [...]
ARE YOUR CONTRACTS WITH SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH POPIA?
By Tebogo Sibidla, Director and Kirsten Whitworth, Senior Associate In anticipation of the coming into operation of the Protection of [...]
SUPERMAC VS MCDONALDS – THE TRADE MARK BATTLE CONTINUES
By Donvay Wegierski, Director The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has partially cancelled McDonald's EU trade mark registration for [...]
PROPOSED TIGHTENING OF THE ANTI-DIVIDEND STRIPPING PROVISIONS
By Erich Bell, Director and Ryan Damon, Candidate Attorney During 2017 and 2018, several changes pertaining to the tax treatment [...]
Red Carded For Playing The Race Card
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The issue of race and racial discrimination is well-recognised in South Africa as a problem area [...]
Reinstatement Not Always An Appropriate Remedy
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether reinstatement must always [...]
