Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) extension: appeal process and update
Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”)
On 27 March 2021 the Unemployment Insurance Fund (”UIF“) issued a letter outlining the appeal process for the lockdown period 16 October 2020 until 15 March 2021.
On 1 March 2021 the UIF opened its online portal for sector based claims. The online portal performed a “real check on the business activity and the main division sector selected by the user”. If the sector selected did not match with the SARS database, one of the following error messages would be generated preventing a claim being lodged.
- The Entity is registered with SARS without Industry/Sector classification;
- The Entity is registered with SARS under “‘|sars class| ‘”class, which is not a qualified sector category for TERS payment; or
- The Entity is not registered with SARS under a qualified sector category for TERS payment (the entity is not registered)
This decision can either be accepted or rejected. Appeals can be lodged via the UIF Call Centre from 6 April 2021. The employer will be subjected to an authentication process and a link will then be sent to the employer to upload an appeal form as well as supporting documentation. A decision will then be made to accept the appeal or decline it.
If the appeal has been approved, the employer may re-lodge their TERS claim within 72 hours. Employers will select their business activity as previously done and select “OTHER (APPROVED APPEALS)” for the main division sector.
Further details regarding the appeal process, as well as further information on changes to the TERS bank verification system, are contained in the letter, which can be accessed at https://www.nsbc.africa/storage/covid_files/1617092816.pdf .
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Lukrisha Ramadu, Candidate Attorney
Latest News
What’s in a name – Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham
by Donvay Wegierski, Director What's in a name - Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham Brooklyn Beckham, son to British born [...]
Not Every Employee Is a Whistleblower (And Not Every Disciplinary Hearing Is Up for Debate)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Modika v Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa and another [...]
Deadlines Are Not Suggestions (And Finality Still Matters)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in NUMSA obo Members v Macsteel Service Centres South Africa [...]
Redundancy and the Duty to Consult: Lessons from Tsogo Sun Casinos v SACCAWU
by Jacques van Wyk - Director and Mike Searle - Candidate Attorney Retrenchment is often described as a ‘no-fault’ dismissal, [...]
Your Workforce Is Not Your Property
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Man Mining Technical Services (Pty) Ltd v Eagle Creek Investments [...]
The Fired and the Furious — and Still Restrained
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in Backsports (Pty) Ltd v Motlhanke and another is a [...]
