Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) update
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Lukrisha Ramadu, Candidate Attorney
On 20 April 2021 the Minister of Employment and Labour published a new direction (“the Direction“) in relation to the Covid-19 Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS“).
The Direction is, in large part, the same as the direction published on 3 March 2021. Our update regarding this direction can be accessed at https://werksmans.com/legal-updates-and-opinions/urgent-update-extension-of-covid-19-temporary-employer-employee-relief-scheme-ters/).
The primary change provided for in the Direction is contained in clause 4.2 which provides as follows:
“4.2. In order to prove that an employer is unable to make alternative arrangements for vulnerable employees to work from home or take alternative measures, and to prove that an employee is in quarantine or isolation and is entitled to benefits the following is required of the employer;
4.2.1 Must submit the categories of data in (a) to (e) below to the National Institute for Occupational Health in the manner set out in the National Department of Health Guidelines:
a. each employee’s vulnerability status for serious outcomes of a Covid-19 infection;
b. details of the Covid-19 screening of employees who are symptomatic;
c. details of employees who test positive in terms of a positive laboratory test for the Covid-19 virus;
d. details of employees identified as high risk contacts within the workplace if a worker has been confirmed as being positive; and
e. details on the post-infection outcomes of those testing positive, including the return to work assessment outcome.
4.2.2 The employee declaration returns by the employer will confirm loss of income and thus inability to make alternative arrangements for the affected employees.”
The Direction is deemed to commence on 16 October 2020 and remains in operation until 15 March 2021.
Latest News
POPIA face-off on Facebook: High Court says social media post is unlawful, orders interdict
In the recent High Court decision of Munetsi v Madhuyu, the applicant sought a court order against the respondents to [...]
SAFM Market Update: Cross Trainer Enters Business Rescue
Dr. Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of our Insolvency & Business Rescue practice area, had a discussion with Jimmy [...]
When Three Legal Planets Align… WhatsApp Must Pay a $220 000 000.00 Fine
The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission ("Commission"), being the foremost agency in Nigeria, responsible for the promotion, protection, and [...]
Waive Goodbye to Uncertainty: Phoenix Salt Industries (Pty) Ltd v The Lubavitch Foundation of Southern Africa
and Laeeqah Kassiem, Candidate Attorney This article discusses the judgement of Phoenix Salt Industries (Pty) Ltd v The Lubavitch Foundation [...]
Mr. Pty Ltd, You Have a Right to Privacy!
When thinking about the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 ("POPIA") individuals often, mistakenly so, think about the [...]
Section 54 – Still a Bar to the Commencement of Mining Activity?
On 5 December 2018, Werksmans published an article on the Constitutional Court Judgment: CCT 265/17 Maledu v Itereleng Bakgatla Mineral [...]