Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) update
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Lukrisha Ramadu, Candidate Attorney
On 20 April 2021 the Minister of Employment and Labour published a new direction (“the Direction“) in relation to the Covid-19 Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS“).
The Direction is, in large part, the same as the direction published on 3 March 2021. Our update regarding this direction can be accessed at https://werksmans.com/legal-updates-and-opinions/urgent-update-extension-of-covid-19-temporary-employer-employee-relief-scheme-ters/).
The primary change provided for in the Direction is contained in clause 4.2 which provides as follows:
“4.2. In order to prove that an employer is unable to make alternative arrangements for vulnerable employees to work from home or take alternative measures, and to prove that an employee is in quarantine or isolation and is entitled to benefits the following is required of the employer;
4.2.1 Must submit the categories of data in (a) to (e) below to the National Institute for Occupational Health in the manner set out in the National Department of Health Guidelines:
a. each employee’s vulnerability status for serious outcomes of a Covid-19 infection;
b. details of the Covid-19 screening of employees who are symptomatic;
c. details of employees who test positive in terms of a positive laboratory test for the Covid-19 virus;
d. details of employees identified as high risk contacts within the workplace if a worker has been confirmed as being positive; and
e. details on the post-infection outcomes of those testing positive, including the return to work assessment outcome.
4.2.2 The employee declaration returns by the employer will confirm loss of income and thus inability to make alternative arrangements for the affected employees.”
The Direction is deemed to commence on 16 October 2020 and remains in operation until 15 March 2021.
Latest News
Deadlines Are Not Suggestions (And Finality Still Matters)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in NUMSA obo Members v Macsteel Service Centres South Africa [...]
Redundancy and the Duty to Consult: Lessons from Tsogo Sun Casinos v SACCAWU
by Jacques van Wyk - Director and Mike Searle - Candidate Attorney Retrenchment is often described as a ‘no-fault’ dismissal, [...]
Your Workforce Is Not Your Property
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Man Mining Technical Services (Pty) Ltd v Eagle Creek Investments [...]
The Fired and the Furious — and Still Restrained
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in Backsports (Pty) Ltd v Motlhanke and another is a [...]
Unpacking the Significant Proposed Changes to the “Generic” Codes of Good Practice (“Codes”) on Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (“BBBEE”)
by Pieter Steyn - Director The Codes set out the methodology for calculating a firm's BBBEE rating. Significant changes [...]
Nowhere to Hide: Regulator Orders JSE to Lift the Veil on Trading Records
by Armand Swart - Director, Hlonelwa Lutuli - Associate, Hanán Jeppie - Candidate Attorney On 5 January 2026, the Information [...]
