Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The hazardous biological agents regulations: COVID-19 in the workplace
Hazardous Biological Agents
by Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate, and Danelle Plaatjies, Candidate Attorney
The Minister of Employment and Labour (“The Minister“) published the Hazardous Biological Agents (“HBA“) Regulations (“Regulations“) on 16 March 2022 in terms of section 43 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 85 of 1993 (“OHSA“). The Regulations concern all forms of HBA. This would include, amongst others, SARS-CoV-2 (“COVID-19“).
The Regulations are to be read in conjunction with the Code of Practice: Managing Exposure to SARS-COV-2 in the Workplace (“Code“) which became effective upon the termination of the national state of disaster on 4 April 2022. An update on the recently published Code can be accessed here.
Application of the Regulations “HBA”
The Regulations list COVID-19 as a Group 3 HBA. A Group 3 HBA is defined as an HBA that “may cause severe human disease, which presents a serious hazard to exposed persons and which may present a risk of spreading to the community, but for which effective prophylaxis and treatment is available”.
The Regulations apply to every employer or self-employed person at a workplace where exposure to COVID-19 may occur. The Regulations contemplate reasonably practicable steps that can be taken on the part of an employer to control the exposure to an HBA in a workplace. This includes, amongst others:
- Risk assessments for HBAs
- Exposure monitoring of HBAs
- Medical surveillance
- Record Keeping
- The Prevention and control of exposure to HBAs
- Personal protective equipment and facilities
Failure to Comply with the Regulations “HBA”
Any person who contravenes or fails to comply with these obligations will be guilty of an offence, and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 12 months. Duties of persons who might be exposed to HBAs.
Latest News
What’s in a name – Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham
by Donvay Wegierski, Director What's in a name - Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham Brooklyn Beckham, son to British born [...]
Not Every Employee Is a Whistleblower (And Not Every Disciplinary Hearing Is Up for Debate)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Modika v Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa and another [...]
Deadlines Are Not Suggestions (And Finality Still Matters)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in NUMSA obo Members v Macsteel Service Centres South Africa [...]
Redundancy and the Duty to Consult: Lessons from Tsogo Sun Casinos v SACCAWU
by Jacques van Wyk - Director and Mike Searle - Candidate Attorney Retrenchment is often described as a ‘no-fault’ dismissal, [...]
Your Workforce Is Not Your Property
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Man Mining Technical Services (Pty) Ltd v Eagle Creek Investments [...]
The Fired and the Furious — and Still Restrained
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in Backsports (Pty) Ltd v Motlhanke and another is a [...]
