Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The International Arbitration Act spells opportunity for South Africa
With the coming into operation of the International Arbitration Act[1] (“Act”) on 20 December 2017, South Africa for the first time has a dedicated statute governing international arbitration. The Act brings South Africa into line with international best practice on international arbitration by providing for the incorporation of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law into South African Law.
The Model Law is the international “gold standard” for modern international arbitration statutes. It provides consistency and familiarity to foreign investors and international businesses, which generally prefer to have the same dispute resolution mechanisms in all their agreements, rather than having to deal with the unfamiliar law and procedure applied by domestic courts in each jurisdiction in which they do business. The Model Law provides an increasingly popular alternative to the divergent approaches taken in international arbitration statutes throughout the world; it has now been adopted by 11 countries in Africa and 78 globally, including many of our co-members in the Southern African Development Community, the African Union and the Commonwealth.
In addition to adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law, the Act re-commits South Africa to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, replacing the statute previously dealing with this. It does not however provide for South Africa’s accession to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), as envisaged in the original version of the Act (drafted twenty years ago), because the South African government’s policy has in the meantime become somewhat more averse to international arbitration as an investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism. This is reflected in the Protection of Investment Act[2], which makes international arbitration voluntary but not compulsory for the SA government in ISDS matters.
The Act gives rise to at least two major opportunities for South Africa. Firstly, it is hoped that the Act will assist South Africa to attract foreign direct investment and boost South Africa as a business destination by giving international businesses the comfort and certainty of a familiar and trusted dispute resolution mechanism for the protection and enforcement of their rights. Secondly, and more ambitiously, the Act might be leveraged to promote South Africa as an international or regional arbitration venue of choice – bearing in mind that arbitration is a consensual process, and the parties are therefore at liberty to select their venue, with a neutral venue often being preferred in order to nullify any perception of home-ground advantage. With its developed-world legal apparatus, convenient geographic location and prospects of enormous costs savings compared to the traditional arbitration center’s such as Paris, London and New York, South Africa is now ideally positioned to market its major cities as international arbitration venues. Merely having the statutory and other infrastructure in place is no guarantee of immediate success in the development of an international arbitration venue, as the Mauritian experience has demonstrated. Nevertheless, the Act is a necessary and welcome first step towards unleashing South Africa’s legal resources to create a regional arbitration destination of choice.
[1] Act 15 of 2017
[2] Act 22 of 2015 – not yet proclaimed and hence not yet operative.
Latest News
Far reaching judgment of the recent silicosis class action case
INTRODUCTION The scope and magnitude of the proposed class actions envisaged in Nkala v Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (Treatment [...]
What happens to confidential information exchanged between the Competition Commission and sector regulators as the number of co-operation
The protection of confidential information has always been a feather in the cap of the Competition Commission (“Commission”). The Competition [...]
Special voluntary disclosure and exchange control relief
By: The Werksmans Tax Team INTRODUCTION Following the announcement of the Special Voluntary Disclosure Programme (SVDP) in [...]
Is the alleged transfer of an insolvent business indeed a transfer as a going concern
Mokhele & Others v Schmidt & Others (JS 564/11) 19 May 2016 ISSUE Whether the alleged transfer of an [...]
Can a strike be rendered unlawful as a result of unlawful acts including acts of violence?
National Union of Food Beverage Wine Spirits and Allied Workers (NUFBWSAW) and others v Universal Product Network (Pty) Ltd In [...]
Is a collective agreement valid and binding, despite a dispute as to the authority of those purporting to conclude the agreement?
South African Airways (Soc) Ltd & another v National Transport Movement & others (Case no: J1872/2015, 12 May 2016) [...]
