Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The Introduction of a Dedicated Insolvency Court in Pretoria
by Eric Levenstein – Director and Head of Insolvency & Business Rescue and Amy Mackechnie – Senior Associate
Following the great success of the pilot dedicated Insolvency Court in Johannesburg, and after deliberations with specialist insolvency practitioners, the Gauteng Division of the High Court has resolved to pilot a dedicated Insolvency Court in the Pretoria High Court, with effect from Term 1 of 2026. The initiative reflects a judicial recognition that insolvency matters require specialist oversight and structured case-flow management to reduce delay, congestion, and procedural uncertainty.
In practical terms, the directive introduces immediate and material changes for insolvency practitioners. Insolvency matters will no longer be accommodated on the general motion or opposed motion rolls and will instead be channelled through a dedicated Insolvency Motion Court or, where appropriate, a dedicated Insolvency Trial Court. Matters will ordinarily be heard on a fixed 7 week cycle from enrolment to hearing (excluding court recess periods). Urgency will be the exception rather than the rule, and will not justify bypassing the insolvency roll. Practitioners are required to correctly classify matters at the issue and enrolment stages, failing which matters risk removal from the roll or adverse cost consequences. More active judicial case management should also be anticipated in complex matters.
The Dedicated Insolvency Court comprises two components, a dedicated Insolvency Motion Court (“IMC“) and a dedicated Insolvency Trial Court (“ITC“). All insolvency related matters, whether opposed, unopposed, or interlocutory, are intended to be heard in this specialised forum. These include sequestration and liquidation applications, business rescue proceedings, rehabilitation proceedings, reviews and interlocutory disputes arising from insolvency proceedings.
A defining feature of the system is the 7 week rolling cycle from enrolment to hearing. Matters will ordinarily be heard in the seventh week after the week in which the request for enrolment is uploaded, excluding recess periods.
The first hearings under this framework will take place during the week of 19 January 2026, being the first week of Term 1. From that week, all insolvency matters already enrolled on the general motion roll or opposed motion roll will be automatically transferred to the dedicated Insolvency Court roll, without any steps being required by practitioners. The directive expressly discourages attempts to bypass the insolvency court by enrolling matters on alternative rolls.
Urgency will be tightly regulated. Only in exceptional circumstances may a matter be heard earlier than the applicable cycle, and practitioners must still satisfy the requirements of the general urgent court. Urgent relief will ordinarily be confined to interim orders or rules nisi, and attempts to manufacture urgency may attract adverse cost consequences.
Where disputes of fact or evidentiary complexity render motion proceedings inappropriate, the court may issue case management directions, including referrals to oral evidence or trial under the supervision of the ITC.
The introduction of the dedicated Insolvency Court in Pretoria is expected to bring greater predictability and efficiency to insolvency proceedings. Clients can anticipate more structured timelines and focused judicial oversight, with matters being managed within a specialist forum designed to reduce delay and improve outcomes.
Latest News
The Regulator is Watching: New Enforcement Signals for POPIA and PAIA Compliance
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory, Armand Swart, Director and Hlonelwa Lutuli, Associate. The Information Regulator (Regulator) has [...]
Are your employees’ wearables creating a new governance blind spot?
by Tebogo Sibidla, Director Over the past decade, organisations have invested heavily in securing workplace technology. Laptops, smartphones, cloud applications [...]
Interviewing for survival: When competitive interviews during retrenchment are fair
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director Employers undertaking restructuring exercises are frequently faced with a practical dilemma: where the new organisational structure [...]
Reinstated today, retrenched tomorrow? The limits of redundancy as a defence to reinstatement
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director Reinstatement has long been recognised as the primary remedy for substantively unfair dismissal under the Labour [...]
Bad process doesn’t make a good dismissal bad: LAC draws a clear line between procedure and substance
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director South African labour law has long recognised that a dismissal can fail for one of two [...]
Think before you prompt: How employee use of AI can shape your organisation’s legal position before lawyers become involved
by Tebogo Sibidla, Director The legal lifecycle begins long before a dispute reaches court, or a regulator commences an investigation. [...]
