Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011
The Act provides simple procedures and remedies in addition to those available to employees in terms of other legislation (such as the LRA, Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended, and Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000, as amended). The Act applies to harassment of both sexual and non-sexual variants.
Non-sexual harassment is conduct which a person knows or ought to know causes harm or inspires the reasonable belief that harm may be caused to the complainant or a related person. This includes following, watching or accosting the complainant or a related person, or loitering near the place where the complainant resides or works. Other forms include unreasonably engaging in communication (which may be verbal or electronic such as email) aimed at the complainant or related person.
If the complainant and harasser are in the same workplace then the employer may incur vicarious liability and have to pay damages. If the complainant obtains a protection order then the employer may be obliged to take measures to ensure that the harasser is able to comply with the protection order. A protection order would be a ground for disciplinary action against the harasser if the action impacts on the employment relationship. If, for example, the employer’s email facilities were used to harass the complainant then the SAPS may request an employer to furnish information relating to emails and employees involved in the harassment. Failure to comply would be regarded as an offence on the part of the employer.
It is essential that employers establish mechanisms to prevent harassment (both non-sexual and sexual) in the workplace. This should include drawing up a harassment policy to inform employees of the serious consequences of breaching the Act.
Latest News
Constitutional Court to finally give clarity on hate speech
by Harold Jacobs, Director and Dakalo Singo, Director On 22 September 2020, the Constitutional Court heard arguments in the case [...]
Another giant trade mark defeat in China – and this time it is FACEBOOK
by Donvay Wegierski, Director After a fourteen-year trade mark battle between Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, and an individual Dr.Su, [...]
Freezing of clients’ account prohibited in certain circumstances
by Tracy-Lee Janse van Rensburg, Director and Juliet Siwela, Candidate Attorney The Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 38 of 2001 ("FIC Act"), [...]
Proposed tax changes to facilitate the relaxation of exchange control require refinement
by Ryan Killoran, Director In the Budget Speech which was delivered on 25 February this year it was announced that [...]
Unfair discrimination on “any other arbitrary ground”
by Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney Reviewed by Jacques van Wyk, Director The Employment Equity Act[1] ("EEA") aims to recognise and [...]
Urgent update: COVID-19 Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) August / September 2020 applications
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Thabisa Yantolo, Candidate Attorney The TERS applications for the [...]
