Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011
The Act provides simple procedures and remedies in addition to those available to employees in terms of other legislation (such as the LRA, Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended, and Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000, as amended). The Act applies to harassment of both sexual and non-sexual variants.
Non-sexual harassment is conduct which a person knows or ought to know causes harm or inspires the reasonable belief that harm may be caused to the complainant or a related person. This includes following, watching or accosting the complainant or a related person, or loitering near the place where the complainant resides or works. Other forms include unreasonably engaging in communication (which may be verbal or electronic such as email) aimed at the complainant or related person.
If the complainant and harasser are in the same workplace then the employer may incur vicarious liability and have to pay damages. If the complainant obtains a protection order then the employer may be obliged to take measures to ensure that the harasser is able to comply with the protection order. A protection order would be a ground for disciplinary action against the harasser if the action impacts on the employment relationship. If, for example, the employer’s email facilities were used to harass the complainant then the SAPS may request an employer to furnish information relating to emails and employees involved in the harassment. Failure to comply would be regarded as an offence on the part of the employer.
It is essential that employers establish mechanisms to prevent harassment (both non-sexual and sexual) in the workplace. This should include drawing up a harassment policy to inform employees of the serious consequences of breaching the Act.
Latest News
COVID-19 regulations: common misconceptions
by Bulelwa Mabasa, Director and head of the Land Reform Restitution & Tenure practice and Thomas Karberg, Candidate attorney The [...]
Regional Competition authorities demand action irrespective of COVID-19
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and head of the Data Privacy practice; Graeme Wickins, Director; and Dimakatso Khumalo, Candidate Attorney Introduction [...]
Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme: tax implications
by Doelie, Lessing, Director and Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate On 16 April 2020 the Minister of Employment and Labour [...]
Directions on fair processes for mining sector during covid-19 lockdown issued
by Chris Stevens, Director and Head of the Mining, Environmental & Resources practice; Kathleen Louw, Director; and Bronwyn Parker, Senior [...]
Exemptions for certain short-term insurers and long-term insurers providing premium relief
by Hilah Laskov, Senior Associate and Chelsea Roux, Candidate AttorneyReviewed by Shayne Krige, Director and head of the Investment Funds & Private [...]
Directive by the FSCA and Prudential Authority
by Hilah Laskov, Senior Associate and Chelsea Roux, Candidate AttorneyReviewed by Shayne Krige, Director and head of the Investment Funds & Private [...]
