Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011
The Act provides simple procedures and remedies in addition to those available to employees in terms of other legislation (such as the LRA, Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended, and Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000, as amended). The Act applies to harassment of both sexual and non-sexual variants.
Non-sexual harassment is conduct which a person knows or ought to know causes harm or inspires the reasonable belief that harm may be caused to the complainant or a related person. This includes following, watching or accosting the complainant or a related person, or loitering near the place where the complainant resides or works. Other forms include unreasonably engaging in communication (which may be verbal or electronic such as email) aimed at the complainant or related person.
If the complainant and harasser are in the same workplace then the employer may incur vicarious liability and have to pay damages. If the complainant obtains a protection order then the employer may be obliged to take measures to ensure that the harasser is able to comply with the protection order. A protection order would be a ground for disciplinary action against the harasser if the action impacts on the employment relationship. If, for example, the employer’s email facilities were used to harass the complainant then the SAPS may request an employer to furnish information relating to emails and employees involved in the harassment. Failure to comply would be regarded as an offence on the part of the employer.
It is essential that employers establish mechanisms to prevent harassment (both non-sexual and sexual) in the workplace. This should include drawing up a harassment policy to inform employees of the serious consequences of breaching the Act.
Latest News
A Snapshot of COP28: the good, the bad and the promising
It has been almost two months since the United Nations ("UN") Climate Change Conference of the Parties to the UN [...]
SARS Binding Private Ruling 399: Replacing an asset shortly after its acquisition under an asset-for-share transaction
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent ruling published by SARS deals with the anti-avoidance implications of the disposal of [...]
Privacy: human right or fallacy in the digital world?
"The real question is, when will we draft an artificial intelligence bill of rights? What will that consist of? And [...]
Communities in the centre of the mining revolution: Land issues dog inclusive mining
Marking its 30th anniversary of the Investing in Mining Indaba in Cape Town, which incidentally coincides with South Africa's 30 [...]
Werksmans Technology Media and Telecommunications Africa Quarterly e‑Bulletin
This e-bulletin highlights key legislative and regulatory developments in the technology, media and telecommunications sectors in sub-Saharan Africa. This issue [...]
No time for dark humour in the workplace – Load shedding is no joke!!
and Tasreeq Ferreira - Candidate Attorney Issue Whether an employee's dismissal for posting a WhatsApp message, purporting to be from [...]