Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011
The Act provides simple procedures and remedies in addition to those available to employees in terms of other legislation (such as the LRA, Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended, and Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000, as amended). The Act applies to harassment of both sexual and non-sexual variants.
Non-sexual harassment is conduct which a person knows or ought to know causes harm or inspires the reasonable belief that harm may be caused to the complainant or a related person. This includes following, watching or accosting the complainant or a related person, or loitering near the place where the complainant resides or works. Other forms include unreasonably engaging in communication (which may be verbal or electronic such as email) aimed at the complainant or related person.
If the complainant and harasser are in the same workplace then the employer may incur vicarious liability and have to pay damages. If the complainant obtains a protection order then the employer may be obliged to take measures to ensure that the harasser is able to comply with the protection order. A protection order would be a ground for disciplinary action against the harasser if the action impacts on the employment relationship. If, for example, the employer’s email facilities were used to harass the complainant then the SAPS may request an employer to furnish information relating to emails and employees involved in the harassment. Failure to comply would be regarded as an offence on the part of the employer.
It is essential that employers establish mechanisms to prevent harassment (both non-sexual and sexual) in the workplace. This should include drawing up a harassment policy to inform employees of the serious consequences of breaching the Act.
Latest News
Enforcement notice issued to Dis-Chem due to contravention of POPIA
and Chiara Ferri, Candidate Attorney The importance of compliance has once again been highlighted as the Information Regulator issued an [...]
What are you worth? “if you’re not paying for a product, then you are a product.”
In the digital world, this happens to be true. But it is not only companies that have realised the value [...]
The privacy of customers seemingly protected by RICA
The Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication Related Information Act 70 of 2002 ("RICA") was enacted more [...]
The publication of information by the Auditor General in terms of PAIA
and Chiara Ferri, Candidate Attorney In the High Court judgment of Sakeliga NPC v The Auditor-General South Africa (36297/2022) [2023] [...]
The Financial Services Tribunal’s position on the withholding of a pension benefit pursuant to a criminal complaint
In this article we will discuss the extent to which employers may withhold a pension benefit if such employer has [...]
OpenAI vs Open AI
OpenAI Inc ("OpenAI"), the originator of ChatGPT, has launched trade mark infringement and unfair competition proceedings in the USA against [...]
