Legal updates and opinions
Post Author
News / News
Trade Marks: Changes to the canadian trade marks act
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
On 17 June 2019, the Canadian Trade Marks Act will be introducing several changes pursuant to it joining the Madrid Protocol, most significantly that it is no longer necessary to provide evidence of use of a mark in Canada to secure registration. With North America being a major trading partner for South Africa, these changes may also present new opportunities for unauthorised third parties, therefore brand owners are advised to ensure that they are adequately protected.
It is anticipated that the Canadian trade mark office will receive an influx of new trade mark applications. The most important changes are set out in the below table:
| CURRENT | AMENDMENT AS OF 17 JUNE 2019 | |
| I | A Declaration of Use of the mark in Canada is required to attain registration. | The “Use” requirement will be removed with no requirement to state a date of first use of the mark in Canada and registration and use abroad. |
| II | There is no Classification system thereby allowing for wide specifications and the payment of a fee for one class. | The International Nice Classification system will be introduced, separating goods and services also requiring the payment of Government fees per class. |
| III | The renewal term is fifteen years. | The renewal term will be reduced to ten years subject to the following:
|
| IV | International designations are not possible. | Canada will join the Madrid Protocol allowing international applications with a centrally administered system, designating member states in which they also want to obtain national protection. To do so the Canadian applicant must already own a domestic (i.e. Canadian) registration. |
| V | The Registrar does not recognise divisional applications. | It will be possible to divide applications permitting non-contentious portions of trade mark applications to proceed to registration while the remainder of the application undergoes examination. |
| VI | Non-use cancellation proceedings cannot be restricted to certain goods and services in a registration. | Non-use cancellation proceedings may be restricted. The non-use term remains three years from date of registration. |
CONSIDERATIONS
- It is anticipated that by removing the requirement to show “Use” that there will be a significant increase in trade mark applications with the result that trade mark owners will need to be even more vigilant, possibly introducing watch services if not yet in place.
- If it is possible to file a Declaration of Use of the mark prior to 17 June 2019, this is recommended attaining a 15 year term of protection as opposed to the new 10 year term.
- Trade mark filing costs will increase if the goods and services fall within more than one class. Should Canada be a territory of interest, it may prove more cost effective to file the trade mark application prior to 17 June 2019.
- Trade marks will also include marks such as colour or a combination of colours, taste, textures, scent, sound, moving images, holograms and 3D shapes.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
AI Quality Management under the EU AI Act: Principles, Obligations and the Links to GDPR and POPIA
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory, and Boitumelo Khwene, Candidate Attorney "The EU AI Act asks a simple [...]
Confidence is not capability (Part 2): Governing AI in the age of the rogue agent
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory In Part 1, “Confidence Is Not Capability (Part 1): What the Data [...]
Confidence is not capability (Part 1): What the data shows, and why POPIA is the foundation of cyber resilience
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory A two-part series drawing on the Data Confidence & AI Readiness in [...]
SABS publishes draft AI standards for public comment
by Wendy Rosenberg, Director and Head of Digital Media & Electronic Communications The South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) has [...]
Too old for the package? Labour Court draws the line on age-based severance
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The Labour Court’s decision in Bosch v Passenger Rail Agency of SA provides employers with a [...]
Proposed Amendments to the Mandatory Mediation Protocol in the Gauteng Division of the High Court: Will the latest attempt to redirect judicial traffic succeed?
by Dakalo Singo, Director and Head of Pro Bono, and Wamkelwe Ntuli, Candidate Attorney Introduction The Gauteng Division of the [...]
