Legal updates and opinions
Author
News / News
Trade Marks: Changes to the canadian trade marks act
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
On 17 June 2019, the Canadian Trade Marks Act will be introducing several changes pursuant to it joining the Madrid Protocol, most significantly that it is no longer necessary to provide evidence of use of a mark in Canada to secure registration. With North America being a major trading partner for South Africa, these changes may also present new opportunities for unauthorised third parties, therefore brand owners are advised to ensure that they are adequately protected.
It is anticipated that the Canadian trade mark office will receive an influx of new trade mark applications. The most important changes are set out in the below table:
| CURRENT | AMENDMENT AS OF 17 JUNE 2019 | |
| I | A Declaration of Use of the mark in Canada is required to attain registration. | The “Use” requirement will be removed with no requirement to state a date of first use of the mark in Canada and registration and use abroad. |
| II | There is no Classification system thereby allowing for wide specifications and the payment of a fee for one class. | The International Nice Classification system will be introduced, separating goods and services also requiring the payment of Government fees per class. |
| III | The renewal term is fifteen years. | The renewal term will be reduced to ten years subject to the following:
|
| IV | International designations are not possible. | Canada will join the Madrid Protocol allowing international applications with a centrally administered system, designating member states in which they also want to obtain national protection. To do so the Canadian applicant must already own a domestic (i.e. Canadian) registration. |
| V | The Registrar does not recognise divisional applications. | It will be possible to divide applications permitting non-contentious portions of trade mark applications to proceed to registration while the remainder of the application undergoes examination. |
| VI | Non-use cancellation proceedings cannot be restricted to certain goods and services in a registration. | Non-use cancellation proceedings may be restricted. The non-use term remains three years from date of registration. |
CONSIDERATIONS
- It is anticipated that by removing the requirement to show “Use” that there will be a significant increase in trade mark applications with the result that trade mark owners will need to be even more vigilant, possibly introducing watch services if not yet in place.
- If it is possible to file a Declaration of Use of the mark prior to 17 June 2019, this is recommended attaining a 15 year term of protection as opposed to the new 10 year term.
- Trade mark filing costs will increase if the goods and services fall within more than one class. Should Canada be a territory of interest, it may prove more cost effective to file the trade mark application prior to 17 June 2019.
- Trade marks will also include marks such as colour or a combination of colours, taste, textures, scent, sound, moving images, holograms and 3D shapes.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Kenya: SONY is not well-known
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors In Sony Corporation vs Sony Holdings Limited the Kenyan High court dismissed the [...]
South Africa: reliance on trade marks in company name objections
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors A further reason to register trade marks is that they can be relied [...]
Dismissing an employee for refusing to obey instructions
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Can you dismiss an employee who refuses to obey [...]
Johannesburg CBD fire – health and safety at work
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The recent fire which broke out in a government building in central Johannesburg lead to the [...]
Labour Webinar
Our Labour experts discuss the implications of the proposed amendments to the Labour Relations Act (LRA) relating to industrial action.
Limiting employment claims: protection where it is needed
South African labour laws are renowned as being progressive and protective of employees' rights, and labour dispute resolution procedures are [...]
