Legal updates and opinions
News / News
What are you worth? “if you’re not paying for a product, then you are a product.”
In the digital world, this happens to be true. But it is not only companies that have realised the value that lies in personal data and have monetised it; personal data is just as valuable for cyber criminals.
Data privacy legislation allows for data subjects to sue for civil damages arising out of data privacy violations. But what is claimed?
Personal data carries immense value for various reasons. At its core, personal data is a resource. Access to information creates a competitive advantage and enables the holder of it to understand the playing field, and strategically position itself to lead the competitive landscape. How personal data is used and valued depends primarily on the ambitions of the holder thereof.
For companies, data is an opportunity to better understand the needs, desires and concerns of their customer. Companies aim to commercialize personal data in order to generate higher revenue or create cost savings. In analyzing an existing data set, new business opportunities, services, or products can be identified. Data mining, pattern recognition, or machine learning algorithms assist in getting to the answer. One thing is for sure and that is that data commercialization involves leveraging data to create new value for a business.
On the other hand, cyber criminals steal personal data for a variety of reasons—blackmail, identity theft, extortion—but the most common is to sell that information to anyone willing to pay.
Recently, Vodacom Tanzania PLC (“Vodacom“) has been confronted with the allegation that they shared personal data with an artificial intelligence chatbot, ChatGPT, without the complainant’s consent.
Mr. Sayida Masanje (“Mr. M“) has asked the court to grant him relief by ordering Vodacom to pay him damages of SH10 billion for the “substantial loss of privacy” caused by Vodacom’s alleged failure to protect his personal data. [1]
Mr. M argues that –
- during February and March 2023, he discovered his personal data on ChatGPT;
- Vodacom purposely facilitated and allowed third-party unauthorised access to his personal data and proprietary network information; and
- the data shared on ChatGPT includes incoming and outgoing calls, IMEI, IMSI, his SIM identity, his location and other personal identifiable information. [2]
But what is the real worth of personal data? Like any market, the value of personal data is based on supply and demand. We know that male data comes at a higher premium that female data. This is just because there are more females than males in the world. The dark web is where cyber criminals go to sell personal data. As of May 2021, you can buy access to a hacked Facebook account on the dark web for $65 (approximately R1,251)!
On the other hand, because health records often reflect a far more complete collection of personal data of an individual, this being personal identifying and sensitive information, health care records have proven to be of particular value for cyber criminals.
The matter against Vodacom is still pending before the Tanzanian High Court and is scheduled to be heard on 13 September 2023.[3] It remains to be seen whether the Tanzanian High Court will find in favour of Mr. M and if so, what value the court will place on the personal information of Mr M.
We await the outcome!
Footnotes:
[1] See “Vodacom Tanzania faces Sh10 billion suit over data privacy” accessed on 27 July 2023.
[2] See “Vodacom Tanzania faces Sh10 billion suit over data privacy” accessed on 27 July 2023.
[3] See “Vodacom Tanzania faces Sh10 billion suit over data privacy” accessed on 27 July 2023.
Latest News
Why failing to revise land policy will fail aspiration of millions
The need for land expropriation must be characterised and understood as being foremost about social justice and a constitutional imperative. [...]
Bye bye FSB, hello FSCA
As of 1 April 2018, there is a new sheriff for the South African financial services sector. The Financial Services [...]
Further tightening of Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment rules proposed by Minister of Trade and Industry
On 29 March 2018, the Minister of Trade and Industry published draft amendments to the Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment [...]
Nando’s vs Fernando’s
Nando's Chicken Limited is the proprietor of at least thirty nine UK trade marks and recently served a letter of [...]
Cryptocurrencies and tax
The advent of cryptocurrencies, and in particular the substantial gains that are associated with investments in cryptocurrencies, caught the attention [...]
Adidas and the stripes
By: Donvay Wegierski, Director In 2015, Adidas successfully opposed the registration of two EU marks comprising two stripes belonging to Shoe [...]
