Legal updates and opinions
News / News
A Guide to The Johannesburg High Court – dedicated Insolvency Court Project
Published On: April 11th, 2025 by Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of Business Rescue & Insolvency, Amy Mackechnie, Senior Associate and Kaymana Han, Candidate Attorney
INTRODUCTION
1. In a landmark step to revolutionise insolvency litigation in South Africa, the Johannesburg High Court has launched a Pilot Dedicated Insolvency Court. Effective from 14 April 2025, this initiative establishes two specialist structures – the Insolvency Motion Court (“IMC”) and the Insolvency Trial Court (“ITC”). The new insolvency court will exclusively manage all insolvency-related applications and trials with the goal of improving efficiency, turnaround times and legal certainty.
PURPOSE
2. This publication outlines the structure, scope, procedures, and timelines associated with the new court. It is intended as a practical guide for practitioners navigating this shift in insolvency proceedings.
THE INSOLVENCY MOTION COURT (“IMC”)
3. The IMC will hear all applications relating to: Sequestration proceedings Rehabilitation proceedings Liquidation proceedings Business rescue proceedings Extension of powers of provisional liquidators Perfection of security (e.g., notarial bonds) Reviews of decisions by the Master of the High Court Interlocutory applications and exceptions in insolvency matters. 4. Enrolments open on 14 April 2025. Hearings commence the week of 12 May 2025. All insolvency matters already enrolled on other motion rolls will automatically be redirected to the IMC. 5. The IMC will follow a 4-week cycle.
Week / Timing | Action / Description |
Week 1 | Request for enrolment is uploaded by the applicant’s attorney, categorised as ‘INSOLVENCY’. |
Week 1 (15 court days before hearing) | Presiding judge receives the roll from the registrar. |
During Week 1 (not later than 11 court days before set down) | Judge notifies the parties of the date and time of hearing. |
Week 4 | Matter is formally set down on Monday and heard during that week. |
6. Urgent applications will only be entertained in exceptional circumstances. The urgent motion court will no longer hear insolvency matters during term time. During recess, the senior judge will decide whether to allocate urgent matters to the IMC or the urgent motion court.
7. To qualify for urgency: Matters must meet standard urgency criteria Interim relief or rule nisi should be sought in the application Papers must be concise and focused
8. Matters that require oral evidence or are too complex or voluminous for the IMC, may be referred to the Deputy Judge President for special allocation. THE INSOLVENCY TRIAL COURT (“ITC”)
9. The ITC will hear trials involving: Impeachment of dispositions Section 424 action proceedings in terms of the Companies Act, 1973; Other actions substantially related to insolvency
10. Parties must ensure the matter is trial-ready in line with practice directives and approach the Deputy Judge President with a motivated request for a trial date. STRATEGIC IMPACT
11. The Dedicated Insolvency Court promises greater speed, efficiency, legal specialisation, and commercial sensibility. It marks a shift towards a litigation environment that recognises the urgency and nuance of insolvency, business rescue and related matters.
12. Practitioners should become familiar with the process and adapt swiftly to leverage this specialised forum for the benefit of their clients.
FLOW CHART INDICATING THE TIME PERIODS IN THE DEDICATED INSOLVENCY MOTION COURT
Latest News
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence in South Africa: Rethinking Authorship and Originality in the Digital Age
by Janine Hollesen, Director & Head of Intellectual Property, Preeta Bhagattjee, Director & Head of Technology & Innovation, and Malique Ukena, Candidate [...]
No! It is NOT all about consent!
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director & Head of Regulatory “I believe that a guarantee of public access to government information is [...]
The Consequences of Lessons not Learnt – A Cautionary POPIA Tale
by Dakalo Singo, Director & Head of Pro Bono and Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director & Head of Regulatory “All men make [...]
To Dismiss or Not to Dismiss – That is the Operational Question
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The recent Labour Court judgment in Inxuba Yethemba Municipality v Msweli & others underscores two important principles for [...]
The Clock is Ticking on Unfair Labour Practice Referrals – Labour Court Confirms They Are One-Time Events
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director In the recent case of NEHAWU obo Makhubele & others v Ramalatso NO & others , the Labour [...]
When a Withdrawal Doesn’t Really Withdraw: Provisional Liquidation is not Set Aside by Withdrawal
by Walid Brown, Director and Nombulelo Bashe, Associate Introduction We were recently reprimanded by an opponent for having the temerity [...]