Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Affected persons are invited – again – to provide comments on The Code of Conduct for The Banking Association of SA
On 24 June 2022, the Information Regulator of South Africa (Information Regulator) published a notice in terms of section 61(2) of the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) that it is in receipt of a code of conduct from the Banking Association of South Africa (BASA) that deals with how personal information will be processed in the banking sector.
The above recent notice is a carbon copy of the notice that was published on 11 June 2021 and also issued under section 61(2) of POPIA inviting affected persons to provide comments to the code of conduct.[1]
Have there been any changes to the code of conduct in the interim? No.
We have previously written on the full extent and expanse of the code of conduct, and note that the code outlines the appropriate practices to be followed by members of BASA for the lawful processing of personal information in terms of POPIA.
Whether by choice or necessity, most South African citizens have a bank account or perform financial transactions with banks. The activities range from online shopping to payment of their monthly bills and bank and credit union account management. All these activities involve huge chunks of personal information and often sensitive information.
Accordingly, the code of conduct serves as a significant undertaking by BASA and its members on how the processing of personal information will comply with POPIA. The notice invites affected persons to provide comments to the code of conduct on or before 14 July 2022.
[1] See the notice issued by the Information Regulator on 11 June 2021, accessed on 30 June 2022.
Latest News
Mandatory vaccinations after the state of emergency is lifted
Consolidated Direction on Occupational Health and Safety measures As has been recently published, the national state of disaster has been [...]
Continuously raising grievances in the workplace held to be a fair ground for dismissal
Raising grievances in the workplace The issue was whether the dismissal of an employee who continuously raised grievances was substantively [...]
Employees signing mutual separation agreements under duress
Signing mutual separation agreements under duress Whether a threat of police action amounts to duress when signing a mutual separation [...]
Dishonesty surrounding the breach of Covid-19 protocols in the workplace is a fair ground for dismissal
Breach of Covid-19 protocols in the workplace Issue Whether dismissal for dishonesty for infringing the employer’s Covid-19 protocols, was procedurally [...]
Constitutional Court confirms invalidity of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (“BBBEE”) pre-qualification criteria for state tenders
Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act by Pieter Steyn, Director 1. In September 2020, the Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA") declared [...]
