Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Business must protect the data of all South Africans
If your business has met all the requirements of European data privacy regulations, do you then also comply with South Africa’s Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA)?
Not necessarily.
Although the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and POPIA share many similar requirements, there are some differences.
The GDPR applies to companies in the European Union (EU), as well as organisations outside the EU that offer goods or services or process personal data of EU citizens. POPIA promotes the constitutional right to privacy of South African individuals and companies by safeguarding the personal information of natural persons and identifiable juristic persons.
Many South African companies with cross-border operations have to be GDPR compliant.
But these companies need to consider the particular nuances of South African society when complying with local data privacy legislation. The main consideration is whether the way in which you are processing personal information is in line with public interest.
So what should companies do?
First and most important, companies need to clearly understand their customers. Think about education levels, literacy, access to technology and geographical location, among others.
Armed with a deep understanding of their customers, companies must then communicate about the use of personal information in a way that is easily understandable to their audience.
The onus to communicate clearly to customers will be higher when complying with POPIA than GDPR given the differences in education levels and sophistication of South African consumers compared to Europeans. South Africa is not only one of the most unequal countries in the world, its education levels also vary considerably across the population. Also, consider that the average person in the European Union is expected to undertake 17.6 years of education over their lifetime (Statista.com). In South Africa the average is 13,5 years (UN Development Programme).
South African companies need to put a lot of thought into making sure they really understand their customers. They need to use plain language in their communications. Should they wish to rely on consent when processing personal information, they will be required to demonstrate that they obtained proper informed consent from a customer. That customer must fully understand that their personal information is being collected and processed and for what purpose. Everyone in society has the exact same right to the privacy of information. Companies need to start thinking about whether their data protection processes cater for the nuances of South African society.
Latest News
Breaking the Chains: the Case of Ndwandwe v Trustees of Transnet Retirement Fund and others – A not-so-friendly reminder that a pension fund is not bound by a nomination form
and Karabo Kekana, Candidate Attorney The recent decision of Ndwandwe v Trustees of Transnet Retirement Fund and others[1] (the Ndwandwe [...]
E-waste versus Sustainability: A battle between people, big tech and responsible recycling
A study conducted by the United Nations University in 2019 estimated that approximately 53.6 million metric tonnes of electrical and [...]
The danger of cutting and pasting provisions in your settlement agreements!
On 21 February 2021, the Labour Appeal Court in Wheelwright v CP de Leeuw Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd (2023) 44 [...]
Mining terminology: the difference between “accepted”, “granted” “executed” and “registered”
Four of the most common words that one hears in conjunction with mining rights, prospecting rights are "accepted", "granted", [...]
Worried about the new EE Amendments? Progressive implementation of numerical targets is possible!
On 12 April 2023 the President signed the Employment Equity (EE) Amendment Bill, 2020 into law. The Act is [...]
An employer’s right to use replacement labour where a lockout has been instituted
and Nyeleti Baloyi, Candidate Attorney On 18 April 2023, the Constitutional Court delivered a judgment on the interpretation of section 76(1)(b) of [...]
