Legal updates and opinions
News / News
CCMA digital platforms
By Michiel Heyns, Senior Associate
Reviewed by Jacques van Wyk, Director
On or about 8 May 2020 the Director of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (“the CCMA“) issued an Urgent Directive in respect of access to the CCMA (“the Directive“).
Through the Directive the CCMA introduced various measures in order to minimise exposure to COVID-19. These efforts include:
- The introduction of a digital case referral and application platform; and
- Where possible, conducting conciliation and arbitration hearings (other than mutual interest or public interest matters), telephonically or by way of digital platforms in order to avoid unnecessary physical contact among parties.
Since then the CCMA conducted a number of digital and telephonic hearings successfully.
In order to conduct hearings by way of digital platforms, some changes to the way parties to disputes previously conducted themselves are now necessary. These include:
- Forms can be signed digitally. Where a party cannot sign a form digitally, the form must be accompanied by a statement confirm the veracity of the information.
- The use of pre-arbitration conferences in order for the parties to endeavour to agree on the virtual aspects of a hearing (for example, which party is to provide digital platform facilities, what platform and protocols will be used, how a party who does not have access to digital platforms and/or data may be assisted and accommodated and the like). If one of the parties is recording the proceedings it can be sent to the Commissioner via an email. If the CCMA records the proceedings, it will also be saved to the normal CCMA recordings database.
- Endeavouring to make such arrangements so as to ensure that the parties are all able to be able to see witnesses if possible in order to avoid allegations that witnesses are being prompted (by others and/or by reading notes). Where this is not possible the Commissioner will take greater care to explain to the witnesses that they are under oath, what it entails and that they cannot be prompted.
- A Commissioner can direct the parties to file a Statement of Case in terms of Rule 19 of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings before the CCMA (“the Rules“) in an effort to shorten hearings (whether physical or digital) insofar as is possible.
- Subpoenas may be served electronically and agreements can be signed electronically where possible. Commissioners must explore creative options when this is not possible, for example reading a settlement agreement into the record with all parties confirming same.
Whilst these measure may seem cumbersome, they can also assist with the resolution of disputes in an expedient manner by – for example – avoiding parties having to incur traveling and similar costs, being away from their work or other obligations for unnecessary periods of time and shortened proceedings.
Latest News
The impact of Mitchell judgement on purchases of immovable property from an insolvent estate
In a recent judgement, of City Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v PJ Mitchell (38/2015) (2015) ZASCA, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that [...]
Tread carefully when merging: tribunal imposes massive fine for failure to notify
In the intricate process of acquiring another business or forming a joint venture, firms often forget to check whether the [...]
The duty to disclose business rescue proceedings
On 14 April 2016, the Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) in the matter of Umso Construction Proprietary Limited (“Umso”) v MEC [...]
Spotlight on boards and shareholder activism
INTRODUCTION Corporate activism places public pressure on boards to improve both financial and non-financial performance of companies. Non-financial performance [...]
New treatment of fractional entitlements in terms of the JSE listings requirements
A recent change to the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) Listings Requirements, which deals with the manner in which entitlements to [...]
Strike action in circumstances where there has been a long delay between the issuing of a certificate of outcome and the subsequent election to embark on a strike
PRASA t/a Metrorail v SATAWU and Others (C190/2016) ISSUE Whether a strike is protected in circumstances where there has [...]
