Legal updates and opinions
News / News
CCMA pronounces on mandatory vaccination policy
Mandatory vaccination policy
On Friday 21 January 2022, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) delivered a much anticipated first pronouncement on the fairness of a dismissal following an employee’s refusal to receive the COVID-19 vaccination.
The publication of the latest iteration of the Consolidated Directions on Occupational Health and Safety Measures in Certain Workplaces under the Disaster Management Act No.57 of 2002 (the Directions), on 11 June 2021, sparked much controversy when the Directions affirmed the right of employers to adopt mandatory vaccination policies subject to certain restrictions.
Before adopting a mandatory vaccination policy an employer must undertake a risk assessment to identify those employees who should be subject to such mandatory vaccination policy on the basis of either the risk of transmission of COVID-19 through the specific work performed by the employee or the risk of severe COVID-19 disease or death by virtue of the employees’ comorbidities.
Adopting a mandatory vaccination policy
The Directions require any employer adopting a mandatory vaccination policy to notify employees identified for mandatory vaccinations of their rights to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine either on Constitutional grounds (the right to bodily integrity, the right to freedom of religion, belief and opinion) or on medical grounds. Employers are obliged to, where possible, reasonably accommodate employees refusing the COVID-19 vaccine.
Following the publication of the Directions, the burning question has been whether an employer may dismiss an employee, subject to its mandatory vaccination policy, for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine. In the case of Theresa Mulderij v Goldrush Group (GAJB 24054-21), the CCMA was called to answer this very question.
In this case, the Goldrush Group (Goldrush) adopted a mandatory vaccination policy in compliance with the Directions in terms of which Theresa Mulderij (Ms M) was required to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. In terms of the policy Ms M was entitled to apply for exemption from the policy, which she duly did. Ms M cited Constitutional grounds, specifically her right to bodily integrity as her reason for refusing the COVID‑19 vaccine.
Dismissed for incapacity
Ms M also alleged that she strictly followed COVID-19 safety protocols and that the COVID-19 vaccine did not stop the spread of the virus but minimized the risk of the severity of COVID-19 symptoms. After consideration of her application for exemption, Goldrush declined her application on the basis that Ms M was required to engage with external clients and internal colleagues by virtue of her position. Ms M was subsequently dismissed for incapacity as she could not be accommodated anywhere in the business.
From a reading of the award it is not clear whether the CCMA, in coming to its decision, gave sufficient consideration to whether Goldrush’s decision to adopt the mandatory vaccination policy was supported by credible medical evidence. The CCMA nevertheless accepted Goldrush’s decision to implement a mandatory vaccination policy, and found that Goldrush had complied with the Directions when implementing its mandatory vaccination policy. The CCMA ultimately held that Ms M’s dismissal was substantively fair, reasoning that Ms M was permanently incapacitated on the basis of her decision not to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.
Although this case is arguably an important decision, it is unlikely to be the final pronouncement on this issue. A number of cases in various fora, including the Labour Court and the High Court, are pending pronouncement in relation to this question, and it is anticipated that these cases will shed more light on whether employers may adopt mandatory vaccination policies, whether employees may be dismissed for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine and if so, the process that an employer should follow to give effect to such dismissal. Considering the right to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine on Constitutional grounds, it is inevitable that these issues will finally be determined by the Constitutional Court.
Employers adopting mandatory vaccination policies walk a fine line between ensuring a safe working environment in compliance with its occupational health and safety obligations, and potentially unduly infringing on employees’ Constitutional rights.
Consequently, notwithstanding the CCMA’s award in Ms M’s case, employers should apply caution when implementing mandatory vaccination policies in respect of specific positions or the entire workforce.
by Anastasia Vatalidis, Director and Head of the Labour and Employment Practice and Kerry Fredericks, Director
Latest News
Tainted treats, spoiled foods and potential dangers…are there any legal safeguards for consumers?
In recent weeks gone by, there have been numerous food poisoning cases reported[1] resulting in serious health issues and, in [...]
It is not only diamonds that are forever – a snapshot of forever and hazardous chemicals
A recent study conducted by the Manchester Metropolitan University revealed that the processes intended to decontaminate noxious liquid landfill waste [...]
Going nowhere fast, proposed amendments to the direct marketing regulations under the CPA published, and your comments are sought!
On October 28, 2024, the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) published draft amendments to the regulations under the [...]
The Collection of Premiums on Behalf of Insurers – A Look at the Impact of The Exemption of Juristic Representatives from Section 13(1)(C) of FAIS
and Khanyisa Tshoba, Candidate Attorney Introduction: In practice the need may arise for an insurer to appoint a third party [...]
The effects of the CPA Amendment Act, 2017
and Elia Chitata - Candidate Attorney With the introduction of the Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994, which [...]
Section 22 – A Springboard into Business Rescue
and Caitlin Steytler – Candidate Attorney In August 2024, Statistics South Africa revealed that 1020 entities filed for liquidation in [...]