Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Employment of foreigners
Recently former Home Affairs Minister, Malusi Gigaba, announced that the Department of Home Affairs will move to punish employers who employ persons with illegal documents or no documents, instead of focusing on prosecution of undocumented employees. He warned businesses and companies that workplace inspections will be increased and that penalties for employing undocumented foreigners will be imposed and managers charged. In Tshwane and Johannesburg seven employers were recently arrested and charged for employing undocumented migrants after 567 business premises were inspected by the Department of Home Affairs.
The Immigration Act 13 of 2002 (as amended) (“the Immigration Act”) requires that any foreigner (a person who is not a citizen of South Africa) must be in possession of a work permit entitling the person to work in South Africa, before such person can validly perform any work in South Africa. It is an offence in terms of the Immigration Act for an employer to employ a foreigner whose status does not allow the foreigner to perform work in South Africa.
In this regard section 49(3) of the Immigration Act provides that anyone who knowingly employs an illegal foreigner or a foreigner in violation of the provisions of the Immigration Act shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment not exceeding one year, provided that such person’s second conviction of such an offence shall be punishable by imprisonment not exceeding two years or a fine, and the third or subsequent convictions of such offences by imprisonment not exceeding three years without the option of a fine.
Sources:
“Clampdown of employers hiring undocumented migrants”, The Citizen, 6 March 2017; “‘We are coming for you’ – Gigaba to businesses employing illegal immigrants”, news24, 23 February 2017.
Should you require any information regarding the above please do not hesitate to contact us.
If you would like to learn more about Labour & Employment please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
When reinstatement is not permissible
and Kelly Sease, Candidate Attorney In terms of section 193(1) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (as amended) [...]
Powers of the Information Regulator and how the Department of Justice could have avoided a R5 million fine
There has been great anxiety amongst organisations since the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) came [...]
Does section 11 (1) of the MPRDA apply to an indirect change in control?
and Mmatshepo Papo - Candidate Attorney In the recent decision of Vantage Goldfields SA (Pty) Ltd & Another v Arqomanzi [...]
When do arbitration awards prescribe?
When does an arbitration award prescribe? Does an award even attract its own period of prescription? The short answer [...]
When is an order of a lower court appealable to a higher court?
Until the recent decision of TWK Agriculture Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Hoogveld Boerderybeleggings (Pty) Ltd and Others[1] (TWK) it [...]
Tax Court or the High Court? The SCA weighs in
The SCA recently handed down two judgments dealing with certain procedural aspects of dispute resolutions as provided for in [...]