Legal updates and opinions
News / News
European Union: Adidas Ruling
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
The General court of the European Union recently upheld a 2016 ruling by the EU regulator thereby cancelling Adidas EU trade mark registration comprising three stripes depicted as:
This trade mark was filed in 2014 and the registration thereof challenged by Belgian company, Shoe Branding Europe. The General court ruled that this trade mark lacked distinctive character and is instead an ordinary figurative mark. The court found that the evidence adduced did not sufficiently show that the consumer, on seeing this three stripe mark applied to clothing, footwear and headgear in the EU would associate the mark with Adidas.
This judgement demonstrates the firm stance adopted by the EU when assessing distinctiveness. Since a trade mark grants the proprietor exclusivity to a mark in relation to the goods and services for which it is registered – in this instance clothing, footwear and headgear in class 25 – the distinctiveness requirement is absolute. The manner in which the trade mark was registered requires particular consideration being three black vertical stripes. Although the court did not find in favour of Adidas in this instance, the ruling may have no effect on the broad scope of protection that Adidas already has on its well-known three stripes registered in various forms in Europe and elsewhere.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Update on the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy Regulation & Directions for the Mining and Energy Sector
COVID-19, Electricity Regulations, REIPPPP, GAS Regulations and the Nuclear New Build Programme By Chris Stevens, Director and Head of the [...]
Professional hunting courses may continue but charter fishing is prohibited – finding a rational balance
Updates on The Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries COVID-19 Directions for Fisheries, Forestry and Biodiversity Sector by Justin Truter, [...]
Non-payment of salaries leads to business rescue
by Bradley Workman-Davies, DirectorThe South Gauteng High court has recently handed down a judgment in which it placed two high [...]
Occupational Health and Safety Directive
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and Thabisa Yantolo, Candidate Attorney On 4 June 2020 the [...]
Update: Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) benefit payment to foreign national workers
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden; Senior Associate; and Thabisa Yantolo, Candidate Attorney On 1 June 2020 the [...]
NUMSA v LUFIL: Does the Constitutional Court judgment accord with government’s policy of orderly bargaining at sectoral level?
By Lloyd Abraham, Director This article is a follow up to the article dealing with the case National Union of [...]
