Legal updates and opinions
News / News
How binding is a CCMA settlement agreement?
Written settlement agreement at the CCMA
If an employee enters into a written settlement agreement at the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (“CCMA”) on the advice of her representative, can she subsequently escape the agreement on the basis that she was duped into doing so by her representative? Can she do so if she entered the agreement under duress or as a result of the undue influence of her representative?
Ordinary laws of contract
In Ulster v the Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd (C 647/2012) [2013] ZALCCT 3 (15 February 2013), the Labour Court was faced with this question. It held that the ordinary laws of contract will apply. Therefore a settlement agreement can only be set aside if it is successfully shown that the employee was placed under the type of duress required in common law. In this case, the employee was a bank manager with 30 years’ experience, she was educated and well-informed.
It was clear she understood the nature of contracts. She understood the nature of the proceedings and agreed to sign the settlement agreement. In the circumstances, she entered into the agreement with open eyes, fully aware of its consequences, and should be bound by the terms thereof.
Common law position on the effect of concluding an agreement
Whilst this decision confirms the common law position on the effect of concluding an agreement, it does highlight that a settlement agreement might not stand up to scrutiny if the employee can show that he or she did not understand the legal significance of signing such an agreement, was not well informed, educated or experienced in such matters. A way to avoid this result would be to ensure that the terms of a settlement agreement are explained to the employee by the Commissioner before he or she signs the agreement.
It may even be advisable to have the agreement translated for the employee if his or her first language is different to that in which the agreement is drafted.
Read more on the CCMA pronounces on mandatory vaccination policy.
Latest News
The Introduction of a Dedicated Insolvency Court in Pretoria
Following the great success of the pilot dedicated Insolvency Court in Johannesburg, and after deliberations with specialist insolvency practitioners, the [...]
Regulatory Snapshot: Financial Services and AML
by Hilah Laskov, Director In this article, we lay out the main regulatory and legal developments in 2025 that [...]
The Need to Plead Properly – Patel vs South African Securitisation Programme (RF) LTD & Others (790/2024) [2025] SASCA 186
by Jennifer Smit, Director On 8 December 2025, the SCA handed down a decision in the above matter which [...]
The union doth protest too much: NUMSA v BMW and the limits of court intervention in disciplinary proceedings
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The Labour Court’s judgment in NUMSA on behalf of Members v BMW (SA) (Pty) Ltd [...]
Evaluating the public interest effects of a merger: The Competition Appeal Court charts the course
by Paul Coetser, Director and Head of Competition and Kwanele Diniso, Associate When evaluating a merger, the Competition Act 89 [...]
What makes the “Best” mobile network? A South African perspective
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory Choosing the “best” mobile network depends on multiple factors. In practice, it [...]
