Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Information Regulator issues Guidelines for the development of Codes of Conduct effective 1 March 2021
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Data Privacy Practice and member of Competition Law Practice; and Dimakatso Khumalo, Candidate Attorney
- On 22 February 2021, the South African Information Regulator (“Regulator“) published Guidelines to develop Codes of Conduct (“Guidelines“) under the Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013 (“POPIA“).
- It is probable that organisations which fall within the same industry will encounter similar or even identical data protection issues. Codes of Conduct provide such organisations with useful guidance on industry-standard approaches to these issues. By developing and implementing Codes of Conduct, organisations are in a better position to demonstrate to individuals that it takes their data protection rights seriously. This, in turn, may persuade those individuals to do business with that organisation rather than with its competitors.
- The South African economy is saturated by a plethora of industries/industry sectors, and professional and vocational bodies (“industry bodies“). All these industry bodies have distinct and unique ways of managing their business, profession or vocation to an extent that there is not a one size fits all compliance approach across all industries. As a consequence, industry specific dynamics ought to inform the way forward considering the impact of POPIA industry members. The conditions and implementation for the lawful processing of personal information under POPIA will undoubtedly be influenced by the distinct features that each of these industry bodies possess. The members of these industry bodies are expected to collect different personal information of their clients as well as employees in order to conduct their business.
- The Guidelines (once effected) envisage to direct and assist relevant bodies, including bodies or class of bodies of specified industries, professions, or vocations, to draft their own Codes of Conduct with the aim ofcompliance with the provisions of POPIA. The Guidelines establish a standard that the Regulator will apply when evaluating Codes of Conduct for approval and also afford to those industries, considering the implementation of a code of conduct, a practical guide to clearly address the aspects that the Regulator deems important.
- The Guidelines will assist relevant bodies to prepare and submit for approval Codes of Conduct to the Regulator. It aims to provide a step by step process guidance. It is clear from the guidelines that industry bodies should conduct consultation with their stakeholders and decide on their own procedures and processes to be followed in dealing with, not only complaints, but also with overall compliance with POPIA through more specific and tailored compliance mechanisms. Simply put, the Codes of Conduct serve as a Roadmap to Compliance.
- These industry bodies will therefore benefit tremendously from Codes of Conduct which are more specific and professional orientated, and which target the unique aspects of the profession they are regulating, while remaining compliant with the provisions of POPIA.
- The guidelines can be downloaded and reviewed in order to consider what impact they will have on you organisation
Latest News
The meaning of the term ‘pay back’ in a settlement agreement
Genrec Engineering (Pty) Ltd v Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council and Others [2016] ZALCJHB 213 (17 June 2016) ISSUE [...]
The impact of Mitchell judgement on purchases of immovable property from an insolvent estate
In a recent judgement, of City Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v PJ Mitchell (38/2015) (2015) ZASCA, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that [...]
Tread carefully when merging: tribunal imposes massive fine for failure to notify
In the intricate process of acquiring another business or forming a joint venture, firms often forget to check whether the [...]
The duty to disclose business rescue proceedings
On 14 April 2016, the Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) in the matter of Umso Construction Proprietary Limited (“Umso”) v MEC [...]
Spotlight on boards and shareholder activism
INTRODUCTION Corporate activism places public pressure on boards to improve both financial and non-financial performance of companies. Non-financial performance [...]
New treatment of fractional entitlements in terms of the JSE listings requirements
A recent change to the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) Listings Requirements, which deals with the manner in which entitlements to [...]
