Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Interest factor
and Lwazi-Lwandile Simelane, Candidate Attorney
In circumstances where a debt arises and the interest rate is not specified, either by contract of by operation of law, the debt in question will attract interest at the prescribed rate of interest in terms of Prescribed rate of Interest Act 55 of 1975 (“the Act”).
Section 3 of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 2015 (“the Amendment”) which amends section 1 of the Act, and which took effect on 8 January 2016, is that the prescribed rate of interest is linked to the repo rate. On our interpretation of the Amendment is that the gazetting of any change to the repo rate by the minister is not required, despite the direction that same is undertaken..
Section 2(1) of the Amendment states that
for the purposes of subsection (1)[1], the rate of interest is the repurchase rate as determined from time to time by the South African Reserve Bank, plus 3.5% p.a.
The change in the prescribed legal rate does not appear at all to be conditional upon the Minister’s compliance with the instruction to Gazette the change in rate, that change is automatic in terms of section 1(2)(c) of the Act which states:
the interest rate contemplated in paragraph (b) is effective from the first day of the second month following the month in which the repurchase rate is determined by the South African Reserve Bank”.
Regardless, the Minister does not appear in any event to have consistently and rigorously adhered to the business of Gazetting every change to the repo rate such that this formal requirement is met.
It matters not. What matters is that practitioners consistently pay close attention to those changes so that the correct rates are applicable to the debts of clients as and when they fall due. The date a debt falls due, is the date when the applicable legal rate of interests attracts to the debt[2], and that rate is then fixed forever, until the debt is paid or in duplum is reached.
To that end, the following handy table provides a snapshot of the rate:
PRESCRIBED / LEGAL RATES OF INTEREST % – UNDER THE PRESCRIBED RATE OF INTEREST ACT (AS AMENDED) | |||
DATE OF REPO CHANGE | REPO RATE | PRESCRIBED RATE (3.5% above REPO after 2016) | APPLICABLE DATE |
n/a | n/a | 20 | 08/02/1985 |
n/a | 15 | 01/08/1986 | |
n/a | 12 | 01/09/1987 | |
n/a | 18.5 | 01/06/1989 | |
n/a | 15.5 | 1/10/1993 – 31/07/2014 | |
n/a | n/a | 9 | 01/08/2014 – 07/01/2016 |
Judicial Matters Amendment Act 24 of 2015 took effect as of 8 Jan 2016 | |||
In place at | 9.75 | 08/01/2016 – 20/02/2016 | |
28/01/2016 | 6.75 | 10.25 | 01/03/2016 – 30/04/2016 |
17/03/2016 | 7 | 10.5 | 01/05/2016 – 31/08/2017 |
20/07/2017 | 6.75 | 10.25 | 01/09/2017 – 30/04/2018 |
28/03/2018 | 6.5 | 10 | 01/05/2018 – 31/12/2018 |
22/11/2018 | 6.75 | 10.25 | 01/01/2019 – 31/08/2019 |
18/07/2019 | 6.5 | 10 | 01/09/2019 – 29/02/2020 |
16/01/2020 | 6.25 | 9.75 | 01/03/2020 – 30/04/2020 |
19/03/2020 | 5.25 | 8.75 | 01/05/2020 – 31/05/2020 |
14/04/2020 | 4.25 | 7.75 | 01/06/2020 – 30/06/2020 |
21/05/2020 | 3.75 | 7.25 | 01/07/2020 – 31/08/2020 |
23/07/2020 | 3.5 | 7 | 01/09/2020 – 31/12/2021 |
18/11/2021 | 3.75 | 7.25 | 01/01/2022 – 28/02/2022 |
27/01/2022 | 4 | 7.5 | 01/03/2022 – 30/04/2022 |
24/03/2022 | 4.25 | 7.75 | 01/05/2022 – 30/06/2022 |
19/05/2022 | 4.75 | 8.25 | 01/07/2022 – 31/08/2022 |
21/07/2022 | 5.5 | 9 | 01/09/2022 – 31/10/2022 |
22/09/2022 | 6.25 | 9.75 | 01/09/2022 -31/12/2022 |
24/11/2022 | 7 | 10.5 | 01/01/2023 – 28/02/2023 |
26/01/2023 | 7.25 | 10.75 | 01/03/2023 – 30/04/2023 |
30/03/2023 | 7.75 | 11.25 | 01/05/2023- 30/06/2023 |
26/05/2023 | 8.25 | 11.75 | 01/07/2023 (current) |
[1] Being the provision addressing the circumstances in which the legal rate of interest applies
[2] Davehill (Pty) Ltd and Others v Community Development Broad 1988 (1) SA 290 (A) & Crookes Brothers Ltd v Regional Land Claims Commission for the Province of Mpumalanga and Others [2013] 2 All SA 1 (SCA)
Latest News
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence in South Africa: Rethinking Authorship and Originality in the Digital Age
by Janine Hollesen, Director & Head of Intellectual Property, Preeta Bhagattjee, Director & Head of Technology & Innovation, and Malique Ukena, Candidate [...]
No! It is NOT all about consent!
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director & Head of Regulatory “I believe that a guarantee of public access to government information is [...]
The Consequences of Lessons not Learnt – A Cautionary POPIA Tale
by Dakalo Singo, Director & Head of Pro Bono and Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director & Head of Regulatory “All men make [...]
To Dismiss or Not to Dismiss – That is the Operational Question
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The recent Labour Court judgment in Inxuba Yethemba Municipality v Msweli & others underscores two important principles for [...]
The Clock is Ticking on Unfair Labour Practice Referrals – Labour Court Confirms They Are One-Time Events
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director In the recent case of NEHAWU obo Makhubele & others v Ramalatso NO & others , the Labour [...]
When a Withdrawal Doesn’t Really Withdraw: Provisional Liquidation is not Set Aside by Withdrawal
by Walid Brown, Director and Nombulelo Bashe, Associate Introduction We were recently reprimanded by an opponent for having the temerity [...]