Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Johannesburg CBD fire – health and safety at work
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director
The recent fire which broke out in a government building in central Johannesburg lead to the tragic loss of lives of three firefighters who were attempting to put out the blaze. The lives, and health of safety of employees working in the building were also put at risk. The latest reports are that the building is only 21% complaint with applicable health and safety regulations, and as such, employees are being allowed to stay at home until such time as a new, compliant premises is available. The situation raises a number of legal considerations for workers in situations in which their health and safety may be compromised by an employer.
Primarily, all employees are protected by health and safety legislation. The Occupational Health and Safety Act, 85 of 1993 (“OHSA”), provides at a high level that “Every employer shall provide and maintain, as far as is reasonably practicable, a working environment that is safe and without risk to the health of his employees”. The OHSA sets out in detail, through General Safety Regulations, the specific obligations imposed on all employers to ensure that workplaces are safe, free from hazards, and that hazard assessments are conducted to ensure real-time knowledge and assessment of risks that may expose employees to unsafe working environments. Any employer who fails to comply with these requirements would be in breach of OHSA, and subject to fines or penalties.
More particularly, employees who are affected by incidents such as the recent fire, would be entitled to the continuation of the employment relationship, notwithstanding that they may be unable to work due to the closure of the premises. As such, even if they are not working, or not at work, this is due to no fault of their own, and they are considered to be tendering their services in the normal course. If the employer is unable to utilise those services, for reasons such as the closure of the premises, it must still pay the employees their usual salaries and benefits in the normal course. Employees may agree to take unpaid periods or leave, or to take annual leave, but these interim measures cannot be imposed on employees in such circumstances without their consent. If injuries have been sustained, and medical certificates can be provided to the employer, paid sick leave will be available to the employees as well.
In addition, if any employees have sustained injuries in the fire, or in any other circumstances in which injury results from the employee performing duties in the course and scope of their employment, these injuries should be compensable in terms of compensation fund legislation. Reports of any injuries should be made by employees to their employer as soon as possible after the injury was sustained, so that the employer can notify the compensation fund. At that point, the Compensation Fund steps in legally to assume liability for the claims.
Employees should be aware of their rights, and their employer’s obligations to ensure that they are not exposed to unsafe working conditions. To the extent that recalcitrant employers are negligent or refuse to comply with their obligations, employees should also be aware that whistleblowing to the relevant regulatory authorities may be an option to force action before unfortunate incidents such as the recent fire take place.
If you would like to learn more about Labour & Employment please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Why failing to revise land policy will fail aspiration of millions
The need for land expropriation must be characterised and understood as being foremost about social justice and a constitutional imperative. [...]
Bye bye FSB, hello FSCA
As of 1 April 2018, there is a new sheriff for the South African financial services sector. The Financial Services [...]
Further tightening of Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment rules proposed by Minister of Trade and Industry
On 29 March 2018, the Minister of Trade and Industry published draft amendments to the Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment [...]
Nando’s vs Fernando’s
Nando's Chicken Limited is the proprietor of at least thirty nine UK trade marks and recently served a letter of [...]
Cryptocurrencies and tax
The advent of cryptocurrencies, and in particular the substantial gains that are associated with investments in cryptocurrencies, caught the attention [...]
Adidas and the stripes
By: Donvay Wegierski, Director In 2015, Adidas successfully opposed the registration of two EU marks comprising two stripes belonging to Shoe [...]
