Legal updates and opinions
News / News
When the law says – confess!
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Head of Data Privacy Practice
The importance of a data breach plan
The South African society has read about, and some members unfortunately experienced, significant data breaches this year already. Even the Presidency’s website was targeted during July 2018. In a statement addressing the incident, Khusela Diko, who is President Cyril Ramaphosa’s spokesperson said that “we can confirm interference with the Presidency website. Our technicians are currently investigating the incident and looking to restore it to operation“.
The hackers identified themselves in the message as “Black Team X”. Another case of hacktivism occurred last year in August, when an infamous cyber group by the name of Anonymous targeted gov.za sites, revoking access to the pages for a weekend.
The lesson fortunately being learned is that it’s not a question of whether a company will experience a data breach, but when. The challenge is to ensure that companies are adequately prepared to successfully deal with a breach, and emerge from the experience wiser and far more robust in terms of knowledge, systems and processes. According to a recent Ponemon Institute study, data breaches are among the top three types of incidents that affect brand reputation.
The extent of stolen or leaked data is often unbelievable. Furthermore, the proactive detection of a data breach rely on advance threat intelligence capabilities and far too often a data breach is detected when it is reported in the media or the company informed by the person responsible for the breach that they have already been compromised.
Once a breach has been contained, organisations are faced with an immense clean-up operation, involving amongst others upgrading of systems, potential administrative fines and legal fees. It is undeniable that an uphill road lies ahead in terms of brand rehabilitation for those that manage to survive a data breach.
In terms of section 22 of the Protection of Personal Information Act, Act 4 of 2013 (“POPIA“), a company has a duty to notify the Information Regulator once a data breach took place. The notification must take place as soon as reasonably possible after the discovery of the compromise, taking into account the legitimate needs of law enforcement and any measures reasonably necessary to determine the scope of the compromise and to restore the integrity of the responsible party’s information system. A data subject must also be notified (unless their identity cannot be established), where it has reason to believe that the personal information of a data subject has been accessed or acquired by any unauthorised person. The POPIA states that a notification to the data subject may only be delayed if a public body responsible for the prevention, detection or investigation of offences or the Information Regulator determines that notification will impede a criminal investigation by the public body concerned.
The good news is that there is much that can be done ahead of time to prepare for a data breach and in so doing everyone can be prepared. It cannot be stressed enough how much time this will save later in trying to determine how to respond. It is imperative to determine which messages a company will communicate from the first disclosure of a data breach through to the final investigation and steps by the Information Regulator. Companies need to consider what to say about the proactive steps they are taking based on the nature of the incident and what customers or those affected need to do and how they intend to help their customers.
In order to be prepared a data breach team is required. The size of the data breach team and its composition depend on several factors. These include the size of the company, the industry involved and the complexity of the business. At many companies the response team includes at least one representative from each of the following areas:
- Human resources
- Information technology or data security
- Communications
- Risk management
- Legal
- Senior management
It is (will be) mandatory for companies to notify the Information Regulator of a data breach once the POPIA has been fully promulgated. Companies will not be able to shy away from this obligation.
Confession is an absolute duty in terms of POPIA. One should be clear on the content of a confession. A confession could very likely bring about unintended consequences. Preparation should never be underestimated.
Latest News
The AI Arms Race and what it means for Competition Law: A new era or new focus
We are not in the habit of writing breathless technology briefings. That is not our role. But the industrial reorganisation [...]
The AI Governance Stack and South Africa’s Draft National AI Policy: An Operational Gap in Search of a Framework
Author's Note I am presently reading Noah M Kenney's Governing Intelligence: Law, Privacy, Security, and Compliance,[1] and it has given [...]
Speak now or forever hold your peace. The draft AI policy has been published and parties have 60 days to comment
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory On 10 April 2026, South Africa's Department of Communications and Digital Technologies [...]
Cracking Down or Catching Up? South Africa’s Approach to Crypto Regulation: Part 4 – Exchange Control Update
by Deon Griessel, Director, Armand Swart, Director, Hlonelwa Lutuli, Associate and Khanyisa Tshoba, Associate In our previous article published on [...]
Business Rescue at the Crossroads: When Creditors Draw the Line
by Dr. Eric Levenstein - Director and Head of Insolvency & Business Rescue, Amy Mackechnie, Senior Associate and Clio Patricios [...]
Courts Enforcing The Right Of Access To Healthcare In Gauteng
by Helen Michael, Director, Slade van Rooyen, Associate and Vhutshilo Muambadzi, Candidate Attorney The present dire state of public healthcare [...]
