Legal updates and opinions
News / News
JSE efforts to reduce red tape in Section 9 of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listing Requirements: Part 2
Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listing
On 5 March 2021, the Issuer Regulation Division of the JSE issued a Market Notice on a JSE Consultation Paper titled “Cutting Red Tape Aimed at Effective and Appropriate Regulation: Request for Comments“. The call for comments closed on 9 April 2021, however, due to the vast interest received from stakeholders, the JSE allowed extensions on request from the public. Please see our initial points which we discussed previously.
Taking into account the comments received from market participants and stakeholders, the JSE has proposed amendments to the JSE Listings Requirements, which will now be subject to further public consultation processes pursuant to the provisions of the JSE Listings Requirements and the Financial Markets Act No 19 of 2012.
Section 9 of the JSE Listings Requirements
In respect of Section 9 of the JSE Listings Requirements, the proposed amendments include –
- increasing the existing 10% limitation to 30% when categorising a transaction which falls within the ordinary course of business of an issuer, measured against the market capitalisation of such an issuer at the time;
- increasing the factors to be considered by the JSE when assessing whether a transaction is in the ordinary course of business;
- a new provision excluding any transactions with directors and/or their associates from the ordinary course of business exemption; and
- a new provision in terms of which transactions classified as ordinary course of business be announced through SENS immediately after the terms have been agreed and where the categorisation is equal to 5% or more. The announcement must deal with the salient details of the ordinary course of business transaction (excluding pricing information as it may be commercially sensitive) and the corporate approvals obtained by the issuer to conclude the ordinary course of business transaction. The announcement must also include “an opinion from the independent members of the board of directors of the issuer that the transaction is in fact in the ordinary course of business and that the transaction was concluded on an arm’s length basis“. Without getting into a detailed exposition of this requirement, what this essentially means is that independent directors must be able to disclose pertinent insights and observations on the transaction in making such an opinion.
The JSE has invited comments to be sent directly to Alwyn Fouchee at AlwynF@jse.co.za on the proposed amendments to the JSE Listings Requirements by no later than 13 September 2021.
Read part of one of the JSE efforts to reduce red tape in Section 9 of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listing Requirements.
By Elliott Wood, Director and Bafana Ntuli, Director
Latest News
Online brand protection practices for brand owners
Online shopping is prevalent due to the ease and convenience with which consumers can purchase goods or services. Consumer decisions [...]
Zambia introduces welcomed revisions in the Trade Marks Bill 2023
Zambia's Trade Mark Legislation is currently the Trade Marks Act (Chapter 401) 1958 ("TM Act") and in 2023 the Trade [...]
South Africa’s Greylisting: Regulatory authorities make progress on the Financial Action Task Force recommendations
Introduction It has been over a year since the Financial Action Task Force ("FATF") announced that South Africa had [...]
Is your business struggling? Liquidation or Business Rescue are not the only options: The Section 155 Compromise
and researched by Thabani Dlamini - Candidate Attorney Introduction When your business is struggling and creditors are knocking down the [...]
Be careful what you wish for: Lessons from the LAC
On 13 October 2021 the Labour Court ("LC") found the dismissal of the employee to be automatically unfair. This was [...]
An extension of the Parate Executie principle in the liquidation context
Emontic Investments (Pty) Ltd v Bothomley and Others[1] Introduction A Parate Executie clause is generally regarded as an impermissible contractual [...]