Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Know the pages you will be judged against
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Head of Data Privacy Practice
The Protection of Personal Information Act, Act 4 of 2013 (“POPIA“) establishes a framework of rights and duties which are designed to safeguard personal data. This framework balances the legitimate needs of companies to collect and use personal data for business and other purposes against the right of individuals to respect the privacy of their personal details. Even though the legislation is complex, it is underpinned by a set of straightforward principles.
POPIA applies to all manual/paper records of personal data, which must be kept securely, as well as electronic files.
POPIA requires that personal data is retained by companies for no longer than is necessary for the purpose or purposes for which it is obtained. This requirement places a responsibility on companies, as responsible parties, to be clear about the length of time for which data will be kept and the reason why the information is being retained.
It is a key requirement of data protection legislation that personal data collected for one purpose cannot be retained once that initial purpose has ceased. Equally important to note is that, as long as personal data is retained, the full obligations of POPIA attach to it.
Companies should always consider the implications of retaining data, for example:
- larger capacity may be required in order to store larger amounts of data, i.e. if data is needed and kept for a long time;
- their ability to satisfy a data subject’s request for access to their personal data. This could be more difficult if companies retain data for longer than they need it;
- it may be more difficult to verify the accuracy of data that was obtained a long time ago;
- data may become outdated and could be used in error.
The POPIA legislation requires companies to ask themselves:
- whether they have defined the retention periods for which they will keep each type of data which they hold;
- whether the retention periods are sufficient and not excessive in relation to the purpose(s) for which they are processing the data;
- what the legislative and regulatory obligations are when deciding on retention periods.
To comply with POPIA, companies should consider having in place:
- a defined policy on retention periods for all items of personal data held;
- necessary procedures to implement such a policy;
- the ability to assign specific responsibility to a designated person for ensuring that files are regularly evaluated safely and securely, and that personal information is not retained any longer than necessary. This process can include appropriate anonymisation of personal data after a defined period if there is a need to retain non-personal data. Anonymisation must be irrevocable and the removing of names/addresses may not necessarily be sufficient. Also, the deletion of information is no longer needed;
- importantly, certain legislation prescribes a statutory minimum retention period. It is imperative that organisations are mindful of these statutory minimum retention periods as minimum requirements.
Presently information can be kept cheaply and effectively on computer. Electronic storage often means that companies do not remain clear about the length of time for which data will be kept and the reason why the information is being retained. The golden rule should always be, if there is no good reason for retaining personal information, then that information should be routinely deleted.
Information should never be kept “just in case” a use could be found for it in the future.
It is suggested that companies consider the following points, as they may help companies to decide on how long retention periods should be:
- the purpose for which the data is or will be processed;
- any surrounding circumstances, e.g. whether or not the company still has dealings with the data subject;
- legislation and regulatory requirements;
- agreed practice within the industry.
Companies should pay particular attention to old information about former customers or clients, which might have been necessary to hold in the past for a particular purpose, but which they no longer require. If companies would like to retain information about customers to help them provide a better service in the future, companies must obtain the customers’ consent in advance. Good housekeeping would also dictate that companies regularly review the need to retain records.
Therefore, companies should have in place a clear, transparent and compelling justification for retaining each class of data for a specified period. This is guided by a records retention schedule.
A data retention policy might not be seen as a very exciting and interesting topic. However, considering the obligations in terms of POPIA, companies should consider a data retention policy to define the periods for which they are going to hold data and to ensure consistency across the organisation.
All personal information kept by companies must be kept in compliance with POPIA. Every piece of personal information held, creates a risk of falling foul of POPIA.
Latest News
Tainted treats, spoiled foods and potential dangers…are there any legal safeguards for consumers?
In recent weeks gone by, there have been numerous food poisoning cases reported[1] resulting in serious health issues and, in [...]
It is not only diamonds that are forever – a snapshot of forever and hazardous chemicals
A recent study conducted by the Manchester Metropolitan University revealed that the processes intended to decontaminate noxious liquid landfill waste [...]
Going nowhere fast, proposed amendments to the direct marketing regulations under the CPA published, and your comments are sought!
On October 28, 2024, the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) published draft amendments to the regulations under the [...]
The Collection of Premiums on Behalf of Insurers – A Look at the Impact of The Exemption of Juristic Representatives from Section 13(1)(C) of FAIS
and Khanyisa Tshoba, Candidate Attorney Introduction: In practice the need may arise for an insurer to appoint a third party [...]
The effects of the CPA Amendment Act, 2017
and Elia Chitata - Candidate Attorney With the introduction of the Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994, which [...]
Section 22 – A Springboard into Business Rescue
and Caitlin Steytler – Candidate Attorney In August 2024, Statistics South Africa revealed that 1020 entities filed for liquidation in [...]