Legal updates and opinions
News / News
New Commercial Courts to include intellectual property matters
On 3 October 2018, the Judge President of the Gauteng division of the High Court issued a Commercial Court Practice Directive, which will apply to the Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg High Court) and Gauteng Division (Pretoria High Court). The Directive was effective immediately.
The Commercial Court, which will be administered as part of the High Court, aims to promote efficient conduct of litigation in the High Court and to resolve disputes quickly, cheaply, fairly and with legal acuity.
The Directive describes a ‘Commercial Court case’ as ordinarily a substantial case that has as its foundation a broadly commercial transaction or commercial relationship and provides for a list of examples of matters that would qualify, which includes intellectual property cases.
Not all cases will however be accepted as a commercial case that will be decided by the Judge President or Deputy Judge President on application made by letter setting out a description of the case and motivation for it to be allocated as a commercial case.
The Directive provides for how the cases should proceed including case management by the allocated judges.
The introduction of the Commercial Courts is welcomed, particularly in light of the specialised nature of the IP matters and also that all trade mark oppositions filed before the Registrar of Trade Marks are being referred to the Pretoria High Court, which can now be dealt with by the Commercial Court and the Commercial Court Directive.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
POPIA face-off on Facebook: High Court says social media post is unlawful, orders interdict
In the recent High Court decision of Munetsi v Madhuyu, the applicant sought a court order against the respondents to [...]
SAFM Market Update: Cross Trainer Enters Business Rescue
Dr. Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of our Insolvency & Business Rescue practice area, had a discussion with Jimmy [...]
Section 54 – Still a Bar to the Commencement of Mining Activity?
On 5 December 2018, Werksmans published an article on the Constitutional Court Judgment: CCT 265/17 Maledu v Itereleng Bakgatla Mineral [...]
When Three Legal Planets Align… WhatsApp Must Pay a $220 000 000.00 Fine
The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission ("Commission"), being the foremost agency in Nigeria, responsible for the promotion, protection, and [...]
Waive Goodbye to Uncertainty: Phoenix Salt Industries (Pty) Ltd v The Lubavitch Foundation of Southern Africa
and Laeeqah Kassiem, Candidate Attorney This article discusses the judgement of Phoenix Salt Industries (Pty) Ltd v The Lubavitch Foundation [...]
Mr. Pty Ltd, You Have a Right to Privacy!
When thinking about the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 ("POPIA") individuals often, mistakenly so, think about the [...]