Legal updates and opinions
News / News
New Commercial Courts to include intellectual property matters
On 3 October 2018, the Judge President of the Gauteng division of the High Court issued a Commercial Court Practice Directive, which will apply to the Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg High Court) and Gauteng Division (Pretoria High Court). The Directive was effective immediately.
The Commercial Court, which will be administered as part of the High Court, aims to promote efficient conduct of litigation in the High Court and to resolve disputes quickly, cheaply, fairly and with legal acuity.
The Directive describes a ‘Commercial Court case’ as ordinarily a substantial case that has as its foundation a broadly commercial transaction or commercial relationship and provides for a list of examples of matters that would qualify, which includes intellectual property cases.
Not all cases will however be accepted as a commercial case that will be decided by the Judge President or Deputy Judge President on application made by letter setting out a description of the case and motivation for it to be allocated as a commercial case.
The Directive provides for how the cases should proceed including case management by the allocated judges.
The introduction of the Commercial Courts is welcomed, particularly in light of the specialised nature of the IP matters and also that all trade mark oppositions filed before the Registrar of Trade Marks are being referred to the Pretoria High Court, which can now be dealt with by the Commercial Court and the Commercial Court Directive.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
The danger of cutting and pasting provisions in your settlement agreements!
On 21 February 2021, the Labour Appeal Court in Wheelwright v CP de Leeuw Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd (2023) 44 [...]
Enhancing Innovation, Technologically
Continuing Werksmans' multi-disciplinary approach in providing our clients with innovative approaches that go beyond the law into wider, business [...]
The proper interpretation of conflicting provisions in the Income Tax Act
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent tax court judgment added valuable jurisprudence to the often-litigated issue of the interpretation [...]
What is the relevance of s 52 of the MPRDA on retrenchments in terms of section 189 and 189A in the mining industry?
In National Union of Mineworkers v Anglo American Platinum Ltd & others (Amplats), on 15 January 2013, Amplats had [...]
Mining terminology: the difference between “accepted”, “granted” “executed” and “registered”
Four of the most common words that one hears in conjunction with mining rights, prospecting rights are "accepted", "granted", [...]
Worried about the new EE Amendments? Progressive implementation of numerical targets is possible!
On 12 April 2023 the President signed the Employment Equity (EE) Amendment Bill, 2020 into law. The Act is [...]
