Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Olympic games: exclusivity and revenue
By: Donvay Wegierski, Director

The protection of the Olympic Symbol, and its torch, flag and anthem is extremely important. According to the Nairobi Treaty on the Protection of the Olympic Symbol, which is an international treaty managed by the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) –
“any state that is a member of this treaty is obliged to refuse or to invalidate the registration as mark and to prohibit by appropriate measures the use, as a mark or sign, for commercial purposes of any sign consisting of or containing the Olympic symbol”.
The Olympics generates revenue through trade mark licensing, one of the key benefits of trade mark registration. The recent Winter Olympics in South Korea was an international spectacle with sponsorship and broadcasting rights no doubt the main source of revenue, funding the Games and contributing to sports development worldwide.
Latest News
The Supreme Court of Appeal steps in to protect the rights of dual-citizens
Many South Africans were unaware that, until 13 June 2023, if they acquired citizenship in another country (other than [...]
Exploring the right to privacy
Where does the right to privacy begin? Where does it end? Consider this in the context of a recent [...]
But first, there is a duty to exhaust internal remedies!
Before an aggrieved requester can approach a court for appropriate relief, following a decision of refusal for access to [...]
One database for all your identification information? Privacy considerations
The Department of Home Affairs (Home Affairs) recently published the Draft National Identification and Registration Bill (Draft Bill). The [...]
AI and protection of data in the mining industry
and Chiara Ferri, Candidate Attorney The mining industry in South Africa has embraced to digital transformation. Machine Learning, Big [...]
Think before issuing instructions to employees
In Association of Mineworkers and Construction workers Union obo Mkhonto & others [13 February 2023], the employees were charged [...]
