Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Prescription of claims: on-demand loans
A loan which is repayable on demand becomes due the moment it is advanced to the debtor. Accordingly, such a debt will prescribe (or be extinguished) three years after the date on which the loan is advanced, unless prescription is interrupted by an acknowledgment of liability by the debtor or the service on the debtor of any process whereby the lender claims payment of the debt. This was the finding of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Trinity Asset Management (Pty) Ltd v Grindstone Investments (Pty) Ltd (1040/15) [2016] ZASCA 135 (29 September 2016), despite the fact that the loan agreement in question provided that the loan would only be “due and payable” within 30 days from the date of delivery of the lender’s written demand.
The court distinguished between when a debt is “claimable” (ie when it becomes due) and when it is “payable”. The fact that the debtor may be given 30 days following demand within which to repay the loan does not alter the principle that the loan becomes due the moment it is advanced and, therefore, prescription starts running from that date. In this case, the lender had demanded repayment of the loan more than three years after the loan was advanced and the court held that the debt had, by that time, already prescribed.
The court considered the proposition that, if the parties clearly indicate that they intend demand to be a condition precedent for the debt to become due, prescription will only begin to run from the date of demand. However, the court did not feel it was necessary to decide whether this proposition was correct as, in its view, it was far from clear that the parties in this case had such an intention.
Until the courts have provided clarity on whether (and on what terms) parties may agree that an on-demand loan will only become due (and prescription will therefore only commence running) once demand for repayment of the loan has been made, lenders would be well-advised to structure their lending arrangements and internal processes in such a way as to minimize the risk of an on-demand debt owing to them being inadvertently extinguished in circumstances similar to this case.
Click on the link if you’ like to more information on Werksmans expertise in the Banking & Finance sector.
Latest News
The requirements for effecting lawful deductions arising out of damages caused by an employee’s negligence
Sections 34(1)(a) and 34(2) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act of 1997 (“BCEA”) state that an employer can make [...]
The importance of the recognition of cultural beliefs in the workplace
Cultural beliefs in the workplace Issue in dispute Can an employee who has a genuine cultural belief that she [...]
Let the litigation funder beware
Litigation funding agreement A litigation funding agreement is an agreement that provides for a non-party to finance a legal action [...]
What’s really right? Corporate Social Responsibility as a legal obligation in South Africa
Corporate Social Responsibility Introduction Corporate Social Responsibility is no longer merely a “nice to have” as it finds [...]
Employment equity: The importance of regional demographics
Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 In terms of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 as amended (“EEA“) designated employers must [...]
The legalities of volunteering – understanding your options and obligations
“It’s in your hands to make the world a better place.” – Nelson Mandela 10 Legalities around volunteering Mandela Day [...]
