Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Prudential Authority Issues Guidance on Climate-Related Governance/Risk Practices and Disclosures for Insurers
By Slade van Rooyen, Candidate Attorney, reviewed by Natalie Scott, Director and Head of Sustainability
On 10 May 2024, the Prudential Authority (“PA“) issued Guidance Notice 1 of 2024: “Guidance on climate-related governance and risk practices for insurers” (“Guidance Notice 1“) and Guidance Notice 2 of 2024: “Guidance on climate-related disclosures for insurers” (“Guidance Notice 2“). The guidance notices provide guidance to insurers regarding the integration of climate-related risks into insurers’ governance and risk management frameworks, and climate-related disclosures, respectively.
Guidance Notice 1 places the responsibility for the effective governance of climate-related risks (“CRRs“) on an insurer’s board of directors. The board and senior management of the insurer are tasked with the review and oversight of CRR management systems and the implementation of climate-related policies. An insurer’s Own Risk Solvency Assessment (“ORSA“) is regarded as a “useful tool” to assess the adequacy of the insurer’s Enterprise Risk Management framework and capital position in light of CRRs. Insurers may use scenario analysis and stress testing as a supplementary risk and capital tool for identifying, monitoring and assessing risk, and scenarios should be designed with a “forward-looking perspective“. Furthermore, the internal policies of insurers must be adapted, and training programmes implemented, to ensure that the impact of CRRs on the insurer’s risk profile is properly understood. Guidance Notice 1 sets out the responsibilities of the insurer’s compliance, actuarial and internal audit functions in respect of CRRs, and deals with the importance of transition plans as a tool for managing CRRs and achieving commitments to climate targets.
Guidance Notice 2 stresses the imperative for insurers to –
“build the necessary capacity and capabilities to assess, manage, and disclose climate-related risks and opportunities within existing risk management and governance frameworks, including any metrics or targets developed by the insurer”.
Guidance Notice 2 sets out the overarching requirements for disclosures of CRRs and opportunities, including that disclosures must, inter alia, focus on relevant and material information, and be complete, objective, accurate, clear, balanced, understandable, consistent and timely. Insurers must, accordingly, ensure that their CRR disclosure reports meet the aforementioned criteria, and disclose how CRRs and opportunities impact on the business model, strategy and decision-making of the insurer. Furthermore, insurers are required to –
- “describe the climate resilience of the insurer’s strategy and business model taking into account climate-related scenario analysis”;
- “describe the extent to which, and how, processes for identifying, assessing, prioritising, managing, mitigating and monitoring climate-related risks are integrated into and inform the insurer’s overall risk management”;
- “disclose metrics and targets that enable stakeholders to evaluate the insurer’s exposure, measurement and management of climate-related risks”; and
- “disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, unless legally required to use a different method by another jurisdictional authority or exchange where the insurer is listed”.
The PA has encouraged insurers to be “proactive” with regard to CRR management and disclosures, particularly in light of the potential for climate-related disclosures to become mandatory in future.
Latest News
A brief retrospective on two cases about UIF and asylum seekers
By Dakalo Singo, Director Introduction The end of February 2020 marks the anniversary of an important court victory which confirmed [...]
South African Airways – Business rescue practitioners hold the reins
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The fate of South African Airways remains inscrutable, and recently there appears to have been some [...]
A horse by the same name?
By Janine Hollesen, Director The High Court in Pretoria has recently ordered the cancellation of numerous trade mark registrations for [...]
The Tax Implications of eliminating Treasury Shares
By Ryan Killoran, Director It is fairly common for a subsidiary company to hold shares in its holding company, colloquially [...]
2020/2021 Budget Proposals – Tax Overview
By: The Werksmans Tax Team INTRODUCTION From 2015/2016, year on year there have been upward adjustments to the various [...]
Tax Implications of CCMA Awards, Labour Court Orders or Settlements
By Michiel Heyns, Senior Associate and Nicholas Fairbairn, Candidate Attorney Reviewed by Doelie Lessing, Director and Jacques van Wyk, Director [...]
