Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Roger federer – the ownership of the trade mark comprising of his initials
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
In August 2018, tennis champion Roger Federer terminated the sponsorship agreement with Nike having entered a US$300 million contract with Japanese casual wear, designer, manufacturer and clothing retailer Uniqlo.
On termination a dispute arose concerning Nike’s ownership of the trade mark , which Nike has registered as a trade mark in twenty five countries. As the mark comprises Roger Federer’s initials, Federer has requested that the trade mark be transferred to himself.
While the use of one’s personal name is recognised as a defence this is only so if consistent with ‘fair practice’ and in this instance the question concerns the terms of the commercial contract entered between Federer and Nike and where the goodwill in the trade marks and intellectual property resides now that it has terminated. The outcome of the dispute is not yet known but it does serve as a salient reminder to take the necessary steps to ensure that an owner files trade marks extensively and protects all intellectual property at the outset in order to ensure that the mark can form the basis of contracts commercialising such intellectual property.
Latest News
Special voluntary disclosure and exchange control relief
By: The Werksmans Tax Team INTRODUCTION Following the announcement of the Special Voluntary Disclosure Programme (SVDP) in [...]
Is the alleged transfer of an insolvent business indeed a transfer as a going concern
Mokhele & Others v Schmidt & Others (JS 564/11) 19 May 2016 ISSUE Whether the alleged transfer of an [...]
Can a strike be rendered unlawful as a result of unlawful acts including acts of violence?
National Union of Food Beverage Wine Spirits and Allied Workers (NUFBWSAW) and others v Universal Product Network (Pty) Ltd In [...]
Is a collective agreement valid and binding, despite a dispute as to the authority of those purporting to conclude the agreement?
South African Airways (Soc) Ltd & another v National Transport Movement & others (Case no: J1872/2015, 12 May 2016) [...]
The meaning of the term ‘pay back’ in a settlement agreement
Genrec Engineering (Pty) Ltd v Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council and Others [2016] ZALCJHB 213 (17 June 2016) ISSUE [...]
The impact of Mitchell judgement on purchases of immovable property from an insolvent estate
In a recent judgement, of City Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v PJ Mitchell (38/2015) (2015) ZASCA, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that [...]
