Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Roger federer – the ownership of the trade mark comprising of his initials
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
In August 2018, tennis champion Roger Federer terminated the sponsorship agreement with Nike having entered a US$300 million contract with Japanese casual wear, designer, manufacturer and clothing retailer Uniqlo.
On termination a dispute arose concerning Nike’s ownership of the trade mark , which Nike has registered as a trade mark in twenty five countries. As the mark comprises Roger Federer’s initials, Federer has requested that the trade mark be transferred to himself.
While the use of one’s personal name is recognised as a defence this is only so if consistent with ‘fair practice’ and in this instance the question concerns the terms of the commercial contract entered between Federer and Nike and where the goodwill in the trade marks and intellectual property resides now that it has terminated. The outcome of the dispute is not yet known but it does serve as a salient reminder to take the necessary steps to ensure that an owner files trade marks extensively and protects all intellectual property at the outset in order to ensure that the mark can form the basis of contracts commercialising such intellectual property.
Latest News
E-waste versus Sustainability: A battle between people, big tech and responsible recycling
A study conducted by the United Nations University in 2019 estimated that approximately 53.6 million metric tonnes of electrical and [...]
The danger of cutting and pasting provisions in your settlement agreements!
On 21 February 2021, the Labour Appeal Court in Wheelwright v CP de Leeuw Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd (2023) 44 [...]
Enhancing Innovation, Technologically
Continuing Werksmans' multi-disciplinary approach in providing our clients with innovative approaches that go beyond the law into wider, business [...]
The proper interpretation of conflicting provisions in the Income Tax Act
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent tax court judgment added valuable jurisprudence to the often-litigated issue of the interpretation [...]
What is the relevance of s 52 of the MPRDA on retrenchments in terms of section 189 and 189A in the mining industry?
In National Union of Mineworkers v Anglo American Platinum Ltd & others (Amplats), on 15 January 2013, Amplats had [...]
Mining terminology: the difference between “accepted”, “granted” “executed” and “registered”
Four of the most common words that one hears in conjunction with mining rights, prospecting rights are "accepted", "granted", [...]
