Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Shifting gears and driving competition: Proposed changes to the Guidelines for Competition in the South African Automotive Aftermarkets
The Competition Commission is proposing changes to its Guidelines for Competition in the South African Automotive Aftermarkets (“Guidelines“), and interested parties have until 13 May 2024 to comment!
The proposed amendments are in essence twofold and seek to –
- amend certain existing definitions and sections of the Guidelines; and
- introduce new sections to the Guidelines.
In particular, the proposed amendments are aimed at amending –
Section 6 of the Guidelines which deals with the appointment of motor-body repairers by original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”)
The proposed amendment suggests that OEMs “should approve any” motor-body repairer applicant that meets their standards and specifications and not limit their decision whether to approve a motor-body repairer to prevailing market conditions or low volumes of work in the area concerned.
Section 7 of the Guidelines which deals with the appointment of service providers and allocation of work by insurers
The proposed amendment suggests that insurers “should approve any” motor-body repairer that meets their standards and specifications to undertake repairs on out-of-warranty motor vehicles and not limit their decision on whether to approve a motor-body repairer to market demand, the volume of claims and work available in the area concerned.
Section 9 of the Guidelines which deals with preventing anti-competitive information sharing by multi-brand dealerships
The proposed amendment –
- substitutes the word “Commercially” with “Competitively” where it appears throughout section 9 of the Guidelines; and
- requires OEMS and approved dealers to implement internal training to ensure its employees are aware of and understand the provisions of the Competition Act 89 of 1998 that are relevant to the exchange of Competitively Sensitive Information between competitors.
Section 11 of the Guidelines which deals with the bundled sale of motor vehicles with value added products
The proposed amendment suggests that –
- OEMS, approved dealers and financiers must disclose to their customers the price of the motor vehicle and the price of the value-added products (such as maintenance and service plans) separately. Importantly, this must be disclosed at the point of sale; and
- consumers must be afforded and notified of the right to cancel a value-added contract (i.e., maintenance and services plans) and/or receive a refund of the value of the balance of the product by approved dealers in instances where there is no replacement motor vehicle after a write-off or it is not feasible to transfer a maintenance plan and/or a service plan to a replacement motor vehicle.
Section 12 which deals with access to technical information and OEM-training for independent service providers
The proposed amendment –
- provides that independent service providers may appoint or use the services of an intermediary to access OEM-technical information on their behalf. The rationale behind this is that independent service providers may incur expenses and experience administrative challenges in accessing OEM-technical information individually; and
- suggests that OEMs must make available to independent service providers or their intermediaries, the OEM-technical information relating to its motor vehicles on reasonable terms and conditions, including terms of usage, confidentiality and fees that are no less favourable to the terms offered to its approved dealers and approved motor-body repairers.
Interested parties have until 13 May 2024 to comment. Please contact us should you require assistance with this.
Latest News
Contracts of temporary employment services employees
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC) ISSUE [...]
SCA judgments: Capstone & Kluh
In our November 2014 edition of Legalwerks, we discussed the decisions of the Full Bench of the High Court of [...]
Property buyers may be liable for historical debt
In a recent judgement handed down by the Supreme Court of Appeal, the court ruled that a hypothec created by [...]
Remuneration of employees in different provinces
Duma v Minister of Correctional Services & others ISSUE Whether the failure to pay an employee in one [...]
Non-striking employees not to be locked out: limitations of the employer’s right to lock out
Transport and Allied Workers Union of South Africa v PUTCO Limited [2016] ZACC On 8 March 2016, in the [...]
Criminalisation of cartels: a potential cure with side effects
Competition authorities particularly in the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia have enacted and entrenched criminal penalties for cartel behaviour. [...]
