Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Significant Changes Made To The Codes Of Good Practice On Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment
By Pieter Steyn, Director
On 31 May 2019, the Minister of Trade and Industry replaced the existing Codes of Good Practice relating to enterprise and supplier development, skills development, the definitions used in the Codes and the general principles and generic score card in the Codes. The amendments will take effect on 31 November 2019. Key changes include:
- the deemed level 1 and level 2 BBBEE ratings available to 100% and 51% black owned firms with a total annual revenue under R50 million will now only apply if such 100% or 51% shareholdings exists using the “flow through” principle, i.e. based on actual direct or indirect shareholdings of black people. The “modified flow through” principle (which deems a 51% or more black shareholding to be 100%) can no longer be used for the purposes of these deeming provisions;
- more detailed guidance has been provided on measuring the BBBEE status of joint ventures and “start‑up” enterprises;
- the 6% target for skills development expenditure on learning programmes for black people has been reduced to 3.5% and a new sub element for skills development expenditure on bursaries for black students has been introduced with a target of 2.5% for a maximum six points. Recognition of skills development expenditure for informal or work place learning programmes has been increased from 15% to 25% of the total value of skills development expenditure;
- in calculating compliance by a firm with the 40% minimum score required for skills development and enterprise/supplier development (failure to comply with the minimum results is an automatic downgrade of a firm’s BBBEE rating by one level), bonus points will not be taken into account. This is important given the potentially dire consequences of an automatic downgrade in BBBEE rating;
- the restriction that beneficiaries of enterprise/supplier development must be 51% black owned firms with less than R50 million annual revenue has been removed. Larger entities are now included provided that when they first received assistance, their annual revenue was under R50 million. This resolves a key conundrum in that, where a firm scored BBBEE points by assisting small black firms and this increased the black firms’ annual revenue above R50 million, such points could no longer be scored and other small black firms had to be found to replace the initial beneficiaries. Other amendments to the enterprise and supplier development codes incentivise the use and support of suppliers and firms, which are 51% black owned.
Changes to existing laws and regulations inevitably causes uncertainty and requires firms to review and adjust their policies and practices. The 80 pages of new codes need to be carefully considered. Firms should review and, where appropriate, adjust their BBBEE strategies before the amendments come into effect on 31 November 2019. Given the importance of BBBEE for business in South Africa, this exercise needs to be started and completed as soon as possible.
Latest News
Use it or lose it!
By Janine Hollesen, Head of Intellectual Property Practice It is important that a trade mark is used as non-use could [...]
How long is too long? Suspension of an employee pending a disciplinary process
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director and Mishkah Abdool Sattar, Candidate Attorney Very often, an employee is suspended while an investigation is [...]
Mining charter 2018 – key elements in the implementation guidelines
By Chris Stevens, Head of Mining & Resources Practice, Kathleen Louw, Director and Bronwyn Parker, Senior Associate INTRODUCTION The Mining [...]
Court victory enables asylum seekers to claim unemployment benefits
By: The Werksmans Pro Bono Team For many years, asylum seekers attempting to claim benefits from the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) [...]
Fixed term contracts – how are they justified?
The use of fixed term contracts of employment appeals to employers for a number of reasons, some of which are [...]
A dismissal arising out of a failure to work overtime for religious reasons may be found to be automatically unfair
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether the dismissal of [...]
