Legal updates and opinions
News / News
South Africa: reliance on trade marks in company name objections
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
A further reason to register trade marks is that they can be relied upon in company name objections.
The Companies Act of 2008 provides for the procedure in which a party can object to the registration of a company name which offends against the provisions of section 11 and the company can be directed to amend its name.
A company name objection can be filed inter alia, if the name –
- is the same as the name of another company;
- is the same as a registered trade mark belonging to a person other than the company, or a mark in respect of which an application has been filed for registration as a trade mark or a well-known trade mark; or
- confusingly similar to a name, trade mark, mark, word or expression.
The objection takes the form of an affidavit filed by the objector in which the basis of the objection is set out in some detail.
As an objector can rely upon trade mark applications and registrations in these objections, it is a further reason to secure trade mark protection.
Werksmans was successful in a recent company name objection on behalf of Capitec Bank against the registration of CAPITEC LIFE by a third party. The objection was based on the name of the company but reliance was also heavily placed on the registered trade marks in Capitec’s name.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
When is an instruction to work overtime unlawful and unenforceable?
and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorney AMCU obo Mkhonto v CCMA and Others (JR 2266/17) [2023] ZALCJHB (13 February 2023) Insubordination [...]
Conciliations and the importance of maintaining impartiality
and Tasreeq Ferreira, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether comments made by a commissioner in conciliation proceedings could give rise to a [...]
When reinstatement is not permissible
and Kelly Sease, Candidate Attorney In terms of section 193(1) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (as amended) [...]
Does section 11 (1) of the MPRDA apply to an indirect change in control?
and Mmatshepo Papo - Candidate Attorney In the recent decision of Vantage Goldfields SA (Pty) Ltd & Another v Arqomanzi [...]
Is a municipal by-law prohibiting transfer of property without a “SPLUMA Certificate” constitutional and valid?
In an unreported case[1] of the High Court of South Africa, Mpumalanga Division, Middelburg ("Court"), a number of owners [...]
(Insurance) fraud unravels all: The SCA confirms that fraud can lead to the forfeiture of a partly valid and partly fraudulent claim when a policy says so
In Discovery Insure Limited v Masindi the SCA considered whether the entirety of an insurance claim should be forfeited [...]
